IVPAF
Price
$7.60
Change
-$0.21 (-2.69%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.92B
32 days until earnings call
WLBMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
60.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVPAF vs WLBMF

Header iconIVPAF vs WLBMF Comparison
Open Charts IVPAF vs WLBMFBanner chart's image
Ivanhoe Mines
Price$7.60
Change-$0.21 (-2.69%)
Volume$573.28K
Capitalization12.92B
Wallbridge Mining
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$58.55K
Capitalization60.17M
IVPAF vs WLBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IVPAF vs. WLBMF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVPAF is a Hold and WLBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IVPAF: $7.60 vs. WLBMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: IVPAF and WLBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVPAF: 140% vs. WLBMF: 25%
Market capitalization -- IVPAF: $12.92B vs. WLBMF: $60.17M
IVPAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $12.92B. WLBMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $60.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVPAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IVPAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLBMF is a better buy in the long-term than IVPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IVPAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IVPAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVPAF is a better buy in the short-term than WLBMF.

Price Growth

IVPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.26% price change this week, while WLBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

IVPAF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVPAF($12.9B) has a higher market cap than WLBMF($60.2M). WLBMF YTD gains are higher at: 16.223 vs. IVPAF (-35.811). IVPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 404M vs. WLBMF (-7.36M). IVPAF has more cash in the bank: 484M vs. WLBMF (29.8M). WLBMF has less debt than IVPAF: WLBMF (26.3K) vs IVPAF (532M). IVPAF (0) and WLBMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
IVPAFWLBMFIVPAF / WLBMF
Capitalization12.9B60.2M21,429%
EBITDA404M-7.36M-5,487%
Gain YTD-35.81116.223-221%
P/E Ratio27.17N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash484M29.8M1,624%
Total Debt532M26.3K2,022,814%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVPAF vs WLBMF: Fundamental Ratings
IVPAF
WLBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54100
SMR RATING
1..100
7091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLBMF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as IVPAF (89). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLBMF (100). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (91). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

WLBMF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as IVPAF (64). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (100). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVPAFWLBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGVC40.090.47
+1.19%
Natural Grocers BY Vitamin Cottage
GLPG28.830.28
+0.98%
Galapagos NV
EXP214.180.44
+0.21%
Eagle Materials
ATMVU11.85N/A
N/A
AlphaVest Acquisition Corp
DIST28.00N/A
N/A
Distoken Acquisition Corp

IVPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVPAF has been closely correlated with LUNMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVPAF jumps, then LUNMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVPAF
1D Price
Change %
IVPAF100%
-2.69%
LUNMF - IVPAF
74%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
CSCCF - IVPAF
71%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
GLNCY - IVPAF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
GLCNF - IVPAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
GMBXF - IVPAF
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
More

WLBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLBMF and LUNMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLBMF and LUNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLBMF
1D Price
Change %
WLBMF100%
+3.00%
LUNMF - WLBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
AZMCF - WLBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
FGOVF - WLBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
IVPAF - WLBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
AAGFF - WLBMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More