It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IVPAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTRN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IVPAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTRN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
IVPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.51% price change this week, while MTRN (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +167.93%.
IVPAF is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2026.
MTRN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| IVPAF | MTRN | IVPAF / MTRN | |
| Capitalization | 12.7B | 2.43B | 522% |
| EBITDA | 355M | 129M | 275% |
| Gain YTD | -20.861 | 19.191 | -109% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.68 | 126.17 | 32% |
| Revenue | 215M | 1.73B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 655M | 12.6M | 5,198% |
| Total Debt | 1.17B | 511M | 229% |
IVPAF | MTRN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTRN's Valuation (84) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as IVPAF (91) in the null industry. This means that MTRN’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.
MTRN's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as IVPAF (57) in the null industry. This means that MTRN’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.
IVPAF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRN (89) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to MTRN’s over the last 12 months.
MTRN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as IVPAF (64) in the null industry. This means that MTRN’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.
MTRN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for IVPAF (96) in the null industry. This means that MTRN’s stock grew significantly faster than IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.
| IVPAF | MTRN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSPTX | 17.51 | N/A | N/A |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Global Insgt C | |||
| IHGIX | 37.42 | -0.41 | -1.08% |
| Hartford Dividend and Growth A | |||
| ACUSX | 13.87 | -0.16 | -1.14% |
| Advisors Capital Total Return – Equity | |||
| ISIVX | 19.46 | -0.33 | -1.67% |
| Voya US Stock Index Port A | |||
| WFDSX | 32.12 | -1.12 | -3.37% |
| Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVPAF has been closely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVPAF jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVPAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVPAF | 100% | +4.23% | ||
| TECK - IVPAF | 70% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| GLNCY - IVPAF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| BHP - IVPAF | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| GLCNF - IVPAF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| RIO - IVPAF | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
More | ||||