Advertisement
IUSG vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IUSG is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IUSG | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSFU | 50.93 | 0.40 | +0.79% |
| Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | |||
| XMLV | 62.89 | 0.48 | +0.77% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | |||
| JAPN | 28.03 | 0.06 | +0.21% |
| Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF | |||
| SCHA | 27.77 | -0.11 | -0.39% |
| Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™ | |||
| AMAX | 8.33 | -0.07 | -0.83% |
| Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | |||
IUSG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IUSG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IUSG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IUSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSG | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| CDNS - IUSG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SNPS - IUSG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| LRCX - IUSG | 76% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| KLAC - IUSG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| AMAT - IUSG | 74% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 90% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||