ITP
Price
$0.28
Change
+$0.03 (+12.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.81M
SUZ
Price
$9.24
Change
-$0.13 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.39B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ITP vs SUZ

Header iconITP vs SUZ Comparison
Open Charts ITP vs SUZBanner chart's image
IT Tech Packaging
Price$0.28
Change+$0.03 (+12.00%)
Volume$1.73M
Capitalization4.81M
Suzano SA
Price$9.24
Change-$0.13 (-1.39%)
Volume$1.56M
Capitalization11.39B
ITP vs SUZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ITP vs. SUZ commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITP is a Hold and SUZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ITP: $0.28 vs. SUZ: $9.24)
Brand notoriety: ITP and SUZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ITP: 34% vs. SUZ: 97%
Market capitalization -- ITP: $4.81M vs. SUZ: $11.39B
ITP [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $4.81M. SUZ’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $11.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ITP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSUZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ITP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SUZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUZ is a better buy in the long-term than ITP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ITP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ITP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SUZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ITP is a better buy in the short-term than SUZ.

Price Growth

ITP (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +17.78% price change this week, while SUZ (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -3.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

SUZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.64% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUZ($11.4B) has a higher market cap than ITP($4.81M). SUZ YTD gains are higher at: -8.696 vs. ITP (-52.860). SUZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 27.4B vs. ITP (4.06M). SUZ has more cash in the bank: 20.4B vs. ITP (6.47M). ITP has less debt than SUZ: ITP (10.2M) vs SUZ (98.4B). SUZ has higher revenues than ITP: SUZ (51.3B) vs ITP (78.4M).
ITPSUZITP / SUZ
Capitalization4.81M11.4B0%
EBITDA4.06M27.4B0%
Gain YTD-52.860-8.696608%
P/E RatioN/A7.73-
Revenue78.4M51.3B0%
Total Cash6.47M20.4B0%
Total Debt10.2M98.4B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ITP vs SUZ: Fundamental Ratings
ITP
SUZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
957
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
9547
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4074
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUZ's Valuation (22) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ITP (64). This means that SUZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than ITP’s over the last 12 months.

SUZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as ITP (100). This means that SUZ’s stock grew similarly to ITP’s over the last 12 months.

SUZ's SMR Rating (47) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ITP (95). This means that SUZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than ITP’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUZ (74). This means that ITP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUZ’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SUZ (100). This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to SUZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ITPSUZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RITA19.540.24
+1.26%
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
DTF11.31N/A
+0.01%
DTF Tax-Free Income 2028 Term Fund
IPAV28.36N/A
N/A
Global X Infrastructure Dev ex-U.S. ETF
EFT11.75-0.02
-0.17%
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust
ETV14.07-0.07
-0.50%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund

ITP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITP and CFPUF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITP and CFPUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITP
1D Price
Change %
ITP100%
+13.40%
CFPUF - ITP
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMPMF - ITP
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLW - ITP
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
MERC - ITP
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
SUZ - ITP
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
More

SUZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUZ and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUZ and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUZ
1D Price
Change %
SUZ100%
-1.39%
SLVM - SUZ
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
MERC - SUZ
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
KLBAY - SUZ
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
MAGN - SUZ
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.55%
BLRDY - SUZ
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More