ITMSF
Price
$2.18
Change
+$0.01 (+0.46%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
130.4M
52 days until earnings call
OLO
Price
$10.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.74B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ITMSF vs OLO

Header iconITMSF vs OLO Comparison
Open Charts ITMSF vs OLOBanner chart's image
Intermap Technologies
Price$2.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.46%)
Volume$188.02K
Capitalization130.4M
Olo
Price$10.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.72M
Capitalization1.74B
ITMSF vs OLO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ITMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ITMSF vs. OLO commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITMSF is a Hold and OLO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ITMSF: $2.17 vs. OLO: $10.26)
Brand notoriety: ITMSF and OLO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ITMSF: 275% vs. OLO: 238%
Market capitalization -- ITMSF: $131.37M vs. OLO: $1.74B
ITMSF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $131.37M. OLO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ITMSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOLO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ITMSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITMSF is a better buy in the long-term than OLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ITMSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ITMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OLO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the short-term than ITMSF.

Price Growth

ITMSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.77% price change this week, while OLO (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

ITMSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

OLO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.06% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OLO($1.74B) has a higher market cap than ITMSF($130M). OLO has higher P/E ratio than ITMSF: OLO (1039.00) vs ITMSF (108.78). OLO YTD gains are higher at: 33.594 vs. ITMSF (28.728). OLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.6M vs. ITMSF (2.04M). OLO has more cash in the bank: 377M vs. ITMSF (7.79M). ITMSF has less debt than OLO: ITMSF (906K) vs OLO (12.7M). OLO has higher revenues than ITMSF: OLO (314M) vs ITMSF (19.7M).
ITMSFOLOITMSF / OLO
Capitalization130M1.74B7%
EBITDA2.04M16.6M12%
Gain YTD28.72833.59486%
P/E Ratio108.781039.0010%
Revenue19.7M314M6%
Total Cash7.79M377M2%
Total Debt906K12.7M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ITMSF vs OLO: Fundamental Ratings
ITMSF
OLO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
434
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3188
SMR RATING
1..100
3392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
328
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLO's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ITMSF (80). This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ITMSF’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLO (88). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLO’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLO (92). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLO’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (40). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

ITMSF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (28). This means that ITMSF’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ITMSFOLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ITMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.411.14
+4.53%
GameStop Corp
TSLA440.4217.03
+4.02%
Tesla
SPY661.783.73
+0.57%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL255.46-1.41
-0.55%
Apple

ITMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITMSF and WRDLY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITMSF and WRDLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITMSF
1D Price
Change %
ITMSF100%
+0.46%
WRDLY - ITMSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLO - ITMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEXXY - ITMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTWK - ITMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.27%
IONI - ITMSF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
More

OLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLO
1D Price
Change %
OLO100%
N/A
WRDLY - OLO
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EVCM - OLO
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
SHOP - OLO
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
QTWO - OLO
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
WEAV - OLO
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
More