| ITM | PZA | ITM / PZA | |
| Gain YTD | 4.631 | 1.897 | 244% |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 3.42B | 61% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.28 | 64% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 4.00 | 275% |
| Yield | 2.81 | 3.41 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| ITM | PZA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 30% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 3 days ago 43% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITM has been loosely correlated with NIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITM jumps, then NIQ could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PZA and NIQ have been poorly correlated (+-6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PZA and NIQ's prices will move in lockstep.