| ITM | NEA | ITM / NEA | |
| Gain YTD | 4.631 | 8.897 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 3.54B | 59% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 1.41 | 13% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 12.00 | 92% |
| Yield | 2.81 | 4.50 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| ITM | NEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITM has been loosely correlated with NIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITM jumps, then NIQ could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that NEA and NIQ have been poorly correlated (+-5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEA and NIQ's prices will move in lockstep.