ITGDF
Price
$2.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
VRCDF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Ad is loading...

ITGDF vs VRCDF

Header iconITGDF vs VRCDF Comparison
Open Charts ITGDF vs VRCDFBanner chart's image
INTEGRAL DIAGNOSTICS
Price$2.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
VERICI DX
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$130
CapitalizationN/A
ITGDF vs VRCDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ITGDF vs. VRCDF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITGDF is a Hold and VRCDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (ITGDF: $2.10 vs. VRCDF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: ITGDF and VRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ITGDF: 100% vs. VRCDF: 1%
Market capitalization -- ITGDF: $459.4M vs. VRCDF: $22.99M
ITGDF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $459.4M. VRCDF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $22.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ITGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRCDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ITGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRCDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITGDF is a better buy in the long-term than VRCDF.

Price Growth

ITGDF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VRCDF (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-2.22% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ITGDF($459M) has a higher market cap than VRCDF($23M). ITGDF YTD gains are higher at: 5.000 vs. VRCDF (-72.727). ITGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 80.5M vs. VRCDF (-10.35M). ITGDF has more cash in the bank: 123M vs. VRCDF (15.7M). VRCDF has less debt than ITGDF: VRCDF (0) vs ITGDF (341M). ITGDF has higher revenues than VRCDF: ITGDF (394M) vs VRCDF (0).
ITGDFVRCDFITGDF / VRCDF
Capitalization459M23M1,996%
EBITDA80.5M-10.35M-778%
Gain YTD5.000-72.727-7%
P/E Ratio34.13N/A-
Revenue394M0-
Total Cash123M15.7M783%
Total Debt341M0-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

ITGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITGDF has been loosely correlated with QDEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITGDF jumps, then QDEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITGDF
1D Price
Change %
ITGDF100%
N/A
QDEL - ITGDF
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
WST - ITGDF
33%
Loosely correlated
+5.05%
SMMNY - ITGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
VRCDF - ITGDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BJDX - ITGDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.70%
More

VRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRCDF and AVNS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRCDF and AVNS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRCDF
1D Price
Change %
VRCDF100%
N/A
AVNS - VRCDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
TNON - VRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.07%
BITGF - VRCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPCY - VRCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.50%
ITGDF - VRCDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More