ITCFY
Price
$14.77
Change
+$0.27 (+1.86%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.87B
MBOF
Price
$38.93
Change
-$0.07 (-0.18%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
71.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ITCFY vs MBOF

Header iconITCFY vs MBOF Comparison
Open Charts ITCFY vs MBOFBanner chart's image
Investec
Price$14.77
Change+$0.27 (+1.86%)
Volume$9K
Capitalization1.87B
Marine Bancorp of Florida
Price$38.93
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
Volume$200
Capitalization71.17M
ITCFY vs MBOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ITCFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ITCFY vs. MBOF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITCFY is a StrongBuy and MBOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ITCFY: $14.77 vs. MBOF: $38.93)
Brand notoriety: ITCFY and MBOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ITCFY: 564% vs. MBOF: 48%
Market capitalization -- ITCFY: $1.87B vs. MBOF: $71.17M
ITCFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.87B. MBOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $71.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ITCFY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMBOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ITCFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MBOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITCFY is a better buy in the long-term than MBOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ITCFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ITCFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBOF is a better buy in the short-term than ITCFY.

Price Growth

ITCFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MBOF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ITCFY($1.87B) has a higher market cap than MBOF($71.2M). MBOF has higher P/E ratio than ITCFY: MBOF (25.12) vs ITCFY (7.82). MBOF YTD gains are higher at: -2.675 vs. ITCFY (-8.326).
ITCFYMBOFITCFY / MBOF
Capitalization1.87B71.2M2,625%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.326-2.675311%
P/E Ratio7.8225.1231%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ITCFY vs MBOF: Fundamental Ratings
ITCFY
MBOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
3100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7773
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6913
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7546

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ITCFY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBOF (84). This means that ITCFY’s stock grew significantly faster than MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

ITCFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBOF (100). This means that ITCFY’s stock grew significantly faster than MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

ITCFY's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBOF (100). This means that ITCFY’s stock grew significantly faster than MBOF’s over the last 12 months.

MBOF's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as ITCFY (77). This means that MBOF’s stock grew similarly to ITCFY’s over the last 12 months.

MBOF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ITCFY (69). This means that MBOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ITCFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ITCFYMBOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ITCFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAPAF31.000.23
+0.75%
Japan Tobacco
GFKRF0.04N/A
N/A
Opus One Gold Corp.
PGPKY5.84N/A
N/A
PGE Polska Energetyczna SA
LVPA1.01N/A
N/A
Lvpai Group Limited
IIPZF9.69-0.01
-0.08%
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust

ITCFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITCFY and SABK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITCFY and SABK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITCFY
1D Price
Change %
ITCFY100%
N/A
SABK - ITCFY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
MBOF - ITCFY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
JFBC - ITCFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INBC - ITCFY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
JBTC - ITCFY
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More

MBOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBOF has been loosely correlated with OAKV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBOF jumps, then OAKV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBOF
1D Price
Change %
MBOF100%
-0.18%
OAKV - MBOF
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SSBP - MBOF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFIN - MBOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
ITCFY - MBOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHDB - MBOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More