ISPO
Price
$4.24
Change
+$0.01 (+0.24%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.82M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PLNT
Price
$100.71
Change
+$1.59 (+1.60%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.35B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ISPO vs PLNT

Header iconISPO vs PLNT Comparison
Open Charts ISPO vs PLNTBanner chart's image
Inspirato
Price$4.24
Change+$0.01 (+0.24%)
Volume$1.21K
Capitalization53.82M
Planet Fitness
Price$100.71
Change+$1.59 (+1.60%)
Volume$18.33K
Capitalization8.35B
ISPO vs PLNT Comparison Chart in %
ISPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ISPO vs. PLNT commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISPO is a Hold and PLNT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (ISPO: $4.24 vs. PLNT: $100.68)
Brand notoriety: ISPO and PLNT are both not notable
ISPO represents the Consumer Sundries, while PLNT is part of the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ISPO: 12% vs. PLNT: 138%
Market capitalization -- ISPO: $53.95M vs. PLNT: $8.35B
ISPO [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $53.95M. PLNT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $8.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $167.2B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $29.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ISPO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLNT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ISPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLNT is a better buy in the long-term than ISPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ISPO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLNT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ISPO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PLNT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLNT is a better buy in the short-term than ISPO.

Price Growth

ISPO (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while PLNT (@Recreational Products) price change was -3.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.07%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLNT is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-3.02% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Recreational Products (+3.02% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLNT($8.36B) has a higher market cap than ISPO($53.8M). PLNT has higher P/E ratio than ISPO: PLNT (41.26) vs ISPO (3.18). ISPO YTD gains are higher at: 1.439 vs. PLNT (-8.620). PLNT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 560M vs. ISPO (55.2M). PLNT has more cash in the bank: 443M vs. ISPO (13.7M). ISPO has less debt than PLNT: ISPO (181M) vs PLNT (2.58B). PLNT has higher revenues than ISPO: PLNT (1.29B) vs ISPO (248M).
ISPOPLNTISPO / PLNT
Capitalization53.8M8.36B1%
EBITDA55.2M560M10%
Gain YTD1.439-8.620-17%
P/E Ratio3.1841.268%
Revenue248M1.29B19%
Total Cash13.7M443M3%
Total Debt181M2.58B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLNT: Fundamental Ratings
PLNT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISPOPLNT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ISPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUTLF5.900.34
+6.02%
Austal Ltd.
TRAGF0.73N/A
N/A
Terago Inc.
UEPEN61.64-0.34
-0.55%
Union Electric Co.
WIZEY11.27-0.27
-2.34%
WISE PLC
MDNGF1.19-0.05
-4.42%
Midnight Sun Mining Corp

ISPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISPO and HAS have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISPO and HAS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISPO
1D Price
Change %
ISPO100%
+0.48%
HAS - ISPO
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
CUK - ISPO
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
MAT - ISPO
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
LTH - ISPO
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
PRKS - ISPO
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More

PLNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLNT has been loosely correlated with LTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLNT jumps, then LTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLNT
1D Price
Change %
PLNT100%
-1.46%
LTH - PLNT
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
OSW - PLNT
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
PTON - PLNT
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.90%
ISPO - PLNT
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
ONEW - PLNT
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
More