ISPO
Price
$3.16
Change
+$0.23 (+7.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
39.41M
MNLXF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.04 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
48.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ISPO vs MNLXF

Header iconISPO vs MNLXF Comparison
Open Charts ISPO vs MNLXFBanner chart's image
Inspirato
Price$3.16
Change+$0.23 (+7.85%)
Volume$1.46M
Capitalization39.41M
MiniLuxe Holding
Price$0.24
Change-$0.04 (-14.29%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization48.44M
ISPO vs MNLXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ISPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ISPO vs. MNLXF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISPO is a Hold and MNLXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ISPO: $3.16 vs. MNLXF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: ISPO and MNLXF are both not notable
ISPO represents the Consumer Sundries, while MNLXF is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ISPO: 2145% vs. MNLXF: 107%
Market capitalization -- ISPO: $39.41M vs. MNLXF: $48.44M
ISPO [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $39.41M. MNLXF’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $48.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $178.44B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ISPO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNLXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ISPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNLXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ISPO is a better buy in the long-term than MNLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ISPO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNLXF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ISPO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MNLXF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ISPO is a better buy in the short-term than MNLXF.

Price Growth

ISPO (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +5.37% price change this week, while MNLXF (@Personnel Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +9.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -6.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+9.70% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-6.56% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNLXF($48.4M) has a higher market cap than ISPO($39.4M). ISPO YTD gains are higher at: -4.819 vs. MNLXF (-31.429). ISPO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.4M vs. MNLXF (-4.1M). ISPO has more cash in the bank: 16.7M vs. MNLXF (7.1M). MNLXF has less debt than ISPO: MNLXF (13M) vs ISPO (199M). ISPO has higher revenues than MNLXF: ISPO (261M) vs MNLXF (26.6M).
ISPOMNLXFISPO / MNLXF
Capitalization39.4M48.4M81%
EBITDA71.4M-4.1M-1,743%
Gain YTD-4.819-31.42915%
P/E Ratio3.85N/A-
Revenue261M26.6M981%
Total Cash16.7M7.1M235%
Total Debt199M13M1,531%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISPOMNLXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ISPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAXPF11.410.39
+3.56%
Sampo OYJ
ACJJF2.44N/A
N/A
Acom Co. Ltd.
BWERY20.00N/A
N/A
BW Energy Limited
BCSO52.00N/A
N/A
Bancorp Southern Indiana
PRRSF0.07N/A
N/A
Prospect Ridge Resources Corp.

ISPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISPO and IVP have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISPO and IVP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISPO
1D Price
Change %
ISPO100%
+7.85%
IVP - ISPO
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
HRB - ISPO
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
ABNB - ISPO
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
LIND - ISPO
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
FTDR - ISPO
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
More

MNLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNLXF and ONVC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNLXF and ONVC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNLXF
1D Price
Change %
MNLXF100%
N/A
ONVC - MNLXF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDRMF - MNLXF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRNR - MNLXF
2%
Poorly correlated
-13.10%
ISPO - MNLXF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+7.85%
IVP - MNLXF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%