ISPO
Price
$2.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14, 11:56 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.84M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAT
Price
$19.50
Change
-$0.06 (-0.31%)
Updated
Nov 14, 12:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.08B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ISPO vs MAT

Header iconISPO vs MAT Comparison
Open Charts ISPO vs MATBanner chart's image
Inspirato
Price$2.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$626
Capitalization32.84M
Mattel
Price$19.50
Change-$0.06 (-0.31%)
Volume$6.01K
Capitalization6.08B
ISPO vs MAT Comparison Chart in %
ISPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ISPO vs. MAT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISPO is a StrongBuy and MAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ISPO: $2.60 vs. MAT: $19.56)
Brand notoriety: ISPO and MAT are both not notable
ISPO represents the Consumer Sundries, while MAT is part of the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ISPO: 387% vs. MAT: 69%
Market capitalization -- ISPO: $32.84M vs. MAT: $6.08B
ISPO [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $32.84M. MAT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $6.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $163.61B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $32.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $16.57B. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ISPO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ISPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAT is a better buy in the long-term than ISPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ISPO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ISPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAT is a better buy in the short-term than ISPO.

Price Growth

ISPO (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +3.59% price change this week, while MAT (@Recreational Products) price change was +4.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.46%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAT is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+0.01% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Recreational Products (-0.45% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAT($6.08B) has a higher market cap than ISPO($32.8M). MAT has higher P/E ratio than ISPO: MAT (14.83) vs ISPO (3.18). MAT YTD gains are higher at: 10.321 vs. ISPO (-21.687). MAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 959M vs. ISPO (71.4M). MAT has more cash in the bank: 870M vs. ISPO (16.7M). ISPO has less debt than MAT: ISPO (199M) vs MAT (2.68B). MAT has higher revenues than ISPO: MAT (5.34B) vs ISPO (261M).
ISPOMATISPO / MAT
Capitalization32.8M6.08B1%
EBITDA71.4M959M7%
Gain YTD-21.68710.321-210%
P/E Ratio3.1814.8321%
Revenue261M5.34B5%
Total Cash16.7M870M2%
Total Debt199M2.68B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAT: Fundamental Ratings
MAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
37
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISPOMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ISPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIOCX19.44-0.26
-1.32%
Hartford International Opportunities C
AEPFX65.86-1.13
-1.69%
American Funds EUPAC F2
CMCRX44.38-0.77
-1.71%
Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx R6
JSVZX25.68-0.50
-1.91%
JPMorgan Small Cap Value R2
CPEIX25.83-0.91
-3.40%
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha I

ISPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISPO and HAS have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISPO and HAS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISPO
1D Price
Change %
ISPO100%
+11.59%
HAS - ISPO
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
CUK - ISPO
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
MAT - ISPO
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
LTH - ISPO
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
PRKS - ISPO
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
More

MAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been closely correlated with HAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then HAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAT
1D Price
Change %
MAT100%
-0.20%
HAS - MAT
68%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
JAKK - MAT
67%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
YETI - MAT
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
GOLF - MAT
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
AS - MAT
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.09%
More