Advertisement
ISPO vs MAT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISPO is a StrongBuy and MAT is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ISPO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ISPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ISPO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ISPO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ISPO (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +2.94% price change this week, while MAT (@Recreational Products) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.31%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAT is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (+0.52% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
@Recreational Products (+0.89% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| ISPO | MAT | ISPO / MAT | |
| Capitalization | 35.4M | 6.6B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 71.4M | 959M | 7% |
| Gain YTD | -15.663 | 19.741 | -79% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.18 | 16.08 | 20% |
| Revenue | 261M | 5.34B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 16.7M | 870M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 199M | 2.68B | 7% |
MAT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 6 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ISPO | MAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 63% | 9 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 18 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NAESX | 124.04 | 1.27 | +1.03% |
| Vanguard Small Cap Index Inv | |||
| GISOX | 17.40 | 0.14 | +0.81% |
| Grandeur Peak Intl Stalwarts Inv | |||
| FEAMX | 17.07 | 0.09 | +0.53% |
| First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund C | |||
| PDAIX | 12.99 | 0.06 | +0.46% |
| PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allc Instl | |||
| APDYX | 24.03 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Artisan Developing World Advisor | |||
ISPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISPO and HAS have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISPO and HAS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISPO | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| HAS - ISPO | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
| CUK - ISPO | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| MAT - ISPO | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.48% | ||
| LTH - ISPO | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
| PRKS - ISPO | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.62% | ||
More | ||||
MAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been closely correlated with JAKK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then JAKK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAT | 100% | +4.48% | ||
| JAKK - MAT | 69% Closely correlated | +4.74% | ||
| HAS - MAT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| YETI - MAT | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| GOLF - MAT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| AS - MAT | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||