ISPC
Price
$0.85
Change
+$0.18 (+26.87%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.5M
IVF
Price
$0.82
Change
-$0.02 (-2.38%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ISPC vs IVF

Header iconISPC vs IVF Comparison
Open Charts ISPC vs IVFBanner chart's image
iSpecimen
Price$0.85
Change+$0.18 (+26.87%)
Volume$107.23K
Capitalization5.5M
INVO Fertility
Price$0.82
Change-$0.02 (-2.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.68M
ISPC vs IVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ISPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ISPC vs. IVF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISPC is a Buy and IVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ISPC: $0.67 vs. IVF: $0.84)
Brand notoriety: ISPC and IVF are both not notable
ISPC represents the Medical Specialties, while IVF is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ISPC: 1990% vs. IVF: 15%
Market capitalization -- ISPC: $5.5M vs. IVF: $3.68M
ISPC [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $5.5M. IVF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $3.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $231.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $10.57B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ISPC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ISPC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVF is a better buy in the long-term than ISPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ISPC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ISPC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVF is a better buy in the short-term than ISPC.

Price Growth

ISPC (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -6.96% price change this week, while IVF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -11.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.96%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+0.22% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.21% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISPC($5.5M) has a higher market cap than IVF($3.68M). IVF YTD gains are higher at: -65.288 vs. ISPC (-74.768). ISPC (-8.01M) and IVF (-8.08M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . ISPC has more cash in the bank: 589K vs. IVF (549K). ISPC has less debt than IVF: ISPC (288K) vs IVF (7.13M). IVF has higher revenues than ISPC: IVF (6.62M) vs ISPC (5.91M).
ISPCIVFISPC / IVF
Capitalization5.5M3.68M149%
EBITDA-8.01M-8.08M99%
Gain YTD-74.768-65.288115%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.91M6.62M89%
Total Cash589K549K107%
Total Debt288K7.13M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVF: Fundamental Ratings
IVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISPCIVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
89%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ISPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMPS5.100.39
+8.28%
COMPASS Pathways Plc
WBUY2.950.06
+2.08%
Webuy Global Ltd
SFM140.071.73
+1.25%
Sprouts Farmers Market
BB3.800.03
+0.80%
BlackBerry Limited
FCEL3.92-0.10
-2.49%
FuelCell Energy Inc

ISPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISPC and AEMD have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISPC and AEMD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISPC
1D Price
Change %
ISPC100%
-0.25%
AEMD - ISPC
33%
Poorly correlated
-45.62%
IVF - ISPC
30%
Poorly correlated
-9.30%
VMTHF - ISPC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPT - ISPC
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.10%
AZTA - ISPC
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
More

IVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVF has been loosely correlated with MGRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVF jumps, then MGRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVF
1D Price
Change %
IVF100%
-9.30%
MGRM - IVF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
ADTX - IVF
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.64%
ISPC - IVF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
HYPR - IVF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RANI - IVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.23%
More