It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ISDR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWFCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ISDR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ISDR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.61% price change this week, while WFCF (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
ISDR is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
WFCF is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2024.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
ISDR | WFCF | ISDR / WFCF | |
Capitalization | 49.3M | 57.7M | 85% |
EBITDA | 5.38M | 3.7M | 145% |
Gain YTD | -45.229 | -17.413 | 260% |
P/E Ratio | 63.58 | 27.64 | 230% |
Revenue | 33.4M | 25.1M | 133% |
Total Cash | 5.71M | 2.64M | 216% |
Total Debt | 20.9M | 2.8M | 746% |
ISDR | WFCF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ISDR's Valuation (59) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as WFCF (59) in the null industry. This means that ISDR’s stock grew similarly to WFCF’s over the last 12 months.
WFCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ISDR (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that WFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ISDR’s over the last 12 months.
WFCF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ISDR (87) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that WFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ISDR’s over the last 12 months.
WFCF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as ISDR (61) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that WFCF’s stock grew similarly to ISDR’s over the last 12 months.
ISDR's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as WFCF (89) in the null industry. This means that ISDR’s stock grew similarly to WFCF’s over the last 12 months.
ISDR | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISDR and HPTO have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISDR and HPTO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ISDR | 100% | N/A | ||
HPTO - ISDR | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AFRM - ISDR | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.94% | ||
PGNY - ISDR | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
DCBO - ISDR | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.78% | ||
SCWX - ISDR | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that WFCF and RADLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFCF and RADLF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WFCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WFCF | 100% | +1.37% | ||
RADLF - WFCF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GUNGF - WFCF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CDTAF - WFCF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BCAN - WFCF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ISDR - WFCF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |