Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISCF vs SCZ
ISCF vs SCZ Comparison
Open Charts ISCF vs SCZ
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Mltfct ETF
Price$44.31
Change+$3.27 (+7.97%)
Volume$51.98K
Net Assets591.19M
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Price$82.39
Change+$5.72 (+7.46%)
Volume$1.37M
Net Assets13.65B
ISCF vs SCZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCF vs. SCZ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCF is a Buy and SCZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCZ has more net assets: 13.6B vs. ISCF (591M). ISCF has a higher annual dividend yield than SCZ: ISCF (6.823) vs SCZ (6.269). ISCF was incepted earlier than SCZ: ISCF (11 years) vs SCZ (18 years). ISCF (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than SCZ (0.40). ISCF has a higher turnover SCZ (18.00) vs SCZ (18.00).
| ISCF | SCZ | ISCF / SCZ | |
| Gain YTD | 6.823 | 6.269 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 591M | 13.6B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.24 | 0.40 | 60% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 18.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 3.55 | 3.13 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ISCF | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ISCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISCF has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ISCF jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISCF | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| BNT - ISCF | 70% Closely correlated | -4.54% | ||
| ING - ISCF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| CXT - ISCF | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| APAM - ISCF | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| FR - ISCF | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||
SCZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCZ has been closely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCZ jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y