Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISCF vs SCZ
ISCF vs SCZ Comparison
Open Charts ISCF vs SCZ
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Mltfct ETF
Price$40.71
Change-$0.13 (-0.32%)
Volume$57.46K
Net Assets500.97M
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Price$76.39
Change-$0.20 (-0.26%)
Volume$629.8K
Net Assets10.68B
ISCF vs SCZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCF vs. SCZ commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCF is a Buy and SCZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCZ has more net assets: 10.7B vs. ISCF (501M). ISCF (28.686) and SCZ (27.642) have matching annual dividend yield . ISCF was incepted earlier than SCZ: ISCF (10 years) vs SCZ (18 years). ISCF (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than SCZ (0.40). SCZ has a higher turnover ISCF (3.79) vs ISCF (3.79).
| ISCF | SCZ | ISCF / SCZ | |
| Gain YTD | 28.686 | 27.642 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 501M | 10.7B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.40 | 58% |
| Turnover | 3.79 | 14.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 3.85 | 2.97 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ISCF | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ISCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISCF has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ISCF jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISCF | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| BNT - ISCF | 70% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| ING - ISCF | 67% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| CXT - ISCF | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| APAM - ISCF | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| RVTY - ISCF | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||
SCZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCZ has been closely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCZ jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y