Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISCCX vs OSMNX
ISCCX vs OSMNX Comparison
Open Charts ISCCX vs OSMNX
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co C
Price$33.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.14M
Invesco International Small-Mid Com R
Price$38.86
Change+$0.05 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.7B
ISCCX vs OSMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCCX vs. OSMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCCX is a StrongBuy and OSMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSMNX has more cash in the bank: 2.7B vs. ISCCX (400M). OSMNX pays higher dividends than ISCCX: OSMNX (1.06) vs ISCCX (0.92). ISCCX was incepted earlier than OSMNX: ISCCX (30 years) vs OSMNX (25 years). ISCCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than OSMNX (1.63). ISCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. OSMNX (21.00). OSMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ISCCX: OSMNX (1000) vs ISCCX (1500). ISCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.69 vs. OSMNX (0.87). ISCCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.84 vs. OSMNX (-27.05).
| ISCCX | OSMNX | ISCCX / OSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.63 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.63 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.177 | 15.662 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 400M | 2.7B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.06 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.69 | 0.87 | 3,055% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 3.61 | 1,387% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.84 | -27.05 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.53 | 11.10 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers