Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISCCX vs MIDCX
ISCCX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts ISCCX vs MIDCX
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co C
Price$33.65
Change-$0.20 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets387.21M
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$30.60
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.84B
ISCCX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCCX vs. MIDCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCCX is a Hold and MIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 6.84B vs. ISCCX (387M). MIDCX pays higher dividends than ISCCX: MIDCX (1.37) vs ISCCX (0.90). ISCCX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: ISCCX (30 years) vs MIDCX (25 years). ISCCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MIDCX (2.06). ISCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ISCCX: MIDCX (1000) vs ISCCX (1500). ISCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.87 vs. MIDCX (1.16). ISCCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.54 vs. MIDCX (-4.25).
| ISCCX | MIDCX | ISCCX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 2.05 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 2.06 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.293 | 14.951 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 387M | 6.84B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.37 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.87 | 1.16 | 2,227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.58 | 26.22 | 277% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.54 | -4.25 | -460% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.80 | 18.08 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement