Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISCCX vs MIDBX
ISCCX vs MIDBX Comparison
Open Charts ISCCX vs MIDBX
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co C
Price$33.44
Change+$0.19 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets475.91M
MFS International New Discovery B
Price$32.49
Change+$0.70 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.78B
ISCCX vs MIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCCX vs. MIDBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCCX is a Hold and MIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.78B vs. ISCCX (476M). ISCCX (0.00) and MIDBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ISCCX was incepted earlier than MIDBX: ISCCX (30 years) vs MIDBX (25 years). ISCCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MIDBX (2.06). ISCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. MIDBX (17.00). MIDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ISCCX: MIDBX (1000) vs ISCCX (1500). ISCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.56 vs. MIDBX (18.36). ISCCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.61 vs. MIDBX (-6.80).
| ISCCX | MIDBX | ISCCX / MIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 2.05 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 2.06 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.455 | 3.835 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 476M | 7.78B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.56 | 18.36 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.53 | 14.60 | 271% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.61 | -6.80 | -127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.13 | 32.94 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers