Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISCCX vs MIDBX
ISCCX vs MIDBX Comparison
Open Charts ISCCX vs MIDBX
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co C
Price$34.71
Change+$0.17 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets426.31M
MFS International New Discovery B
Price$31.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.57B
ISCCX vs MIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCCX vs. MIDBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCCX is a Hold and MIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.57B vs. ISCCX (426M). MIDBX pays higher dividends than ISCCX: MIDBX (1.07) vs ISCCX (0.92). ISCCX was incepted earlier than MIDBX: ISCCX (30 years) vs MIDBX (25 years). ISCCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MIDBX (2.06). ISCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. MIDBX (15.00). MIDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ISCCX: MIDBX (1000) vs ISCCX (1500). ISCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.73 vs. MIDBX (13.56). ISCCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.31 vs. MIDBX (-8.45).
| ISCCX | MIDBX | ISCCX / MIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 2.05 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 2.06 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.603 | 14.265 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 426M | 7.57B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.73 | 13.56 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.62 | 18.97 | 314% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.31 | -8.45 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.62 | 19.46 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers