Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISCAX vs MIDBX
ISCAX vs MIDBX Comparison
Open Charts ISCAX vs MIDBX
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co A
Price$50.45
Change+$0.51 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets376.36M
MFS International New Discovery B
Price$32.30
Change+$0.22 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.94B
ISCAX vs MIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCAX vs. MIDBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCAX is a Hold and MIDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDBX has more cash in the bank: 6.94B vs. ISCAX (376M). ISCAX pays higher dividends than MIDBX: ISCAX (1.36) vs MIDBX (1.06). ISCAX was incepted earlier than MIDBX: ISCAX (30 years) vs MIDBX (25 years). MIDBX (2.06) is less costly to investors than ISCAX (1.55). ISCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. MIDBX (15.00). MIDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ISCAX: MIDBX (1000) vs ISCAX (1500). ISCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.06 vs. MIDBX (5.31). ISCAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.67 vs. MIDBX (0.57).
| ISCAX | MIDBX | ISCAX / MIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.05 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 2.06 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.984 | 17.540 | 171% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 376M | 6.94B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.06 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.06 | 5.31 | 547% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.25 | 19.53 | 314% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.67 | 0.57 | 6,085% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.59 | 26.12 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement