Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ISCAX vs MIDBX
ISCAX vs MIDBX Comparison
Open Charts ISCAX vs MIDBX
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.61 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets334.69M
MFS International New Discovery B
Price$30.95
Change-$0.33 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.38B
ISCAX vs MIDBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCAX vs. MIDBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCAX is a StrongBuy and MIDBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDBX has more cash in the bank: 6.38B vs. ISCAX (335M). ISCAX pays higher dividends than MIDBX: ISCAX (1.44) vs MIDBX (1.11). ISCAX was incepted earlier than MIDBX: ISCAX (29 years) vs MIDBX (25 years). MIDBX (2.06) is less costly to investors than ISCAX (1.55). ISCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. MIDBX (15.00). MIDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ISCAX: MIDBX (1000) vs ISCAX (1500). ISCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.02 vs. MIDBX (6.43). ISCAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.88 vs. MIDBX (5.47).
| ISCAX | MIDBX | ISCAX / MIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.05 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 2.06 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.321 | 12.627 | 185% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 335M | 6.38B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.11 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.02 | 6.43 | 373% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.65 | 16.53 | 343% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.88 | 5.47 | 803% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.61 | 13.09 | 157% |