ISBA
Price
$35.80
Change
+$0.70 (+1.99%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
263.48M
2 days until earnings call
SFBS
Price
$75.21
Change
+$0.42 (+0.56%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.11B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ISBA vs SFBS

Header iconISBA vs SFBS Comparison
Open Charts ISBA vs SFBSBanner chart's image
Isabella Bank
Price$35.80
Change+$0.70 (+1.99%)
Volume$9.35K
Capitalization263.48M
ServisFirst Bancshares
Price$75.21
Change+$0.42 (+0.56%)
Volume$268.12K
Capitalization4.11B
ISBA vs SFBS Comparison Chart in %
ISBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ISBA vs. SFBS commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISBA is a Hold and SFBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ISBA: $35.80 vs. SFBS: $75.21)
Brand notoriety: ISBA and SFBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ISBA: 65% vs. SFBS: 121%
Market capitalization -- ISBA: $263.48M vs. SFBS: $4.11B
ISBA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $263.48M. SFBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ISBA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ISBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ISBA is a better buy in the long-term than SFBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ISBA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ISBA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ISBA is a better buy in the short-term than SFBS.

Price Growth

ISBA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.80% price change this week, while SFBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

ISBA is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($4.11B) has a higher market cap than ISBA($263M). SFBS (16.46) and ISBA (16.35) have similar P/E ratio . ISBA YTD gains are higher at: 41.805 vs. SFBS (-9.767). SFBS has more cash in the bank: 141M vs. ISBA (34.2M). ISBA has less debt than SFBS: ISBA (29.5M) vs SFBS (64.7M). SFBS has higher revenues than ISBA: SFBS (516M) vs ISBA (70.5M).
ISBASFBSISBA / SFBS
Capitalization263M4.11B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.805-9.767-428%
P/E Ratio16.3516.4699%
Revenue70.5M516M14%
Total Cash34.2M141M24%
Total Debt29.5M64.7M46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ISBA vs SFBS: Fundamental Ratings
ISBA
SFBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1748
SMR RATING
1..100
5616
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1782
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFBS's Valuation (81) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ISBA (82) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to ISBA’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ISBA’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ISBA (56) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ISBA’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (63) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ISBA’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

ISBA's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (82) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ISBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISBASFBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ISBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AADEX28.970.17
+0.59%
American Beacon Large Cap Value R5
HNCTX22.390.05
+0.22%
Hartford International Growth R5
FSPGX45.56N/A
N/A
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Idx
BSMKX18.22-0.02
-0.11%
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Idx K
WELNX11.45-0.09
-0.78%
William Blair Emerging Mkts Ldrs N

ISBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISBA and PMHG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISBA and PMHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISBA
1D Price
Change %
ISBA100%
+1.99%
PMHG - ISBA
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
FUNC - ISBA
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
ORRF - ISBA
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
SFBS - ISBA
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
BANF - ISBA
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
+0.56%
SBCF - SFBS
90%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
SSB - SFBS
90%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
TRMK - SFBS
90%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
UBSI - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
+2.68%
FBK - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
More