IRVRF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
OCANF
Price
$2.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
102 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IRVRF vs OCANF

Header iconIRVRF vs OCANF Comparison
Open Charts IRVRF vs OCANFBanner chart's image
Irving Resources
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.11K
CapitalizationN/A
Oceanagold
Price$2.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$203.38K
CapitalizationN/A
IRVRF vs OCANF Comparison Chart
Loading...
OCANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRVRF vs. OCANF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRVRF is a Hold and OCANF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (IRVRF: $0.22 vs. OCANF: $2.76)
Brand notoriety: IRVRF and OCANF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRVRF: 13% vs. OCANF: 175%
Market capitalization -- IRVRF: $23.68M vs. OCANF: $1.58B
IRVRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $23.68M. OCANF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRVRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOCANF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IRVRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OCANF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCANF is a better buy in the long-term than IRVRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCANF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OCANF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

IRVRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.12% price change this week, while OCANF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

OCANF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCANF($1.58B) has a higher market cap than IRVRF($23.7M). OCANF YTD gains are higher at: 44.802 vs. IRVRF (-49.108). OCANF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 195M vs. IRVRF (-2.03M). IRVRF has less debt than OCANF: IRVRF (180K) vs OCANF (304M). OCANF has higher revenues than IRVRF: OCANF (938M) vs IRVRF (0).
IRVRFOCANFIRVRF / OCANF
Capitalization23.7M1.58B1%
EBITDA-2.03M195M-1%
Gain YTD-49.10844.802-110%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0938M-
Total Cash6.58MN/A-
Total Debt180K304M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IRVRF vs OCANF: Fundamental Ratings
IRVRF
OCANF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
566
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
9189
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IRVRF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCANF (91). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCANF’s over the last 12 months.

OCANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (100). This means that OCANF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

OCANF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (91). This means that OCANF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

OCANF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (61). This means that OCANF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

OCANF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IRVRF (100). This means that OCANF’s stock grew significantly faster than IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCANF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OCANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

IRVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRVRF and KUYAF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRVRF and KUYAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRVRF
1D Price
Change %
IRVRF100%
-8.52%
KUYAF - IRVRF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
EMPYF - IRVRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.11%
FSXLF - IRVRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.59%
OCANF - IRVRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
CMCL - IRVRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
More

OCANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCANF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCANF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCANF
1D Price
Change %
OCANF100%
+2.04%
AEM - OCANF
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
AGI - OCANF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
AU - OCANF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
KGC - OCANF
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
PAAS - OCANF
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
More