IRVRF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
15.77M
KGLDF
Price
$0.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
26.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IRVRF vs KGLDF

Header iconIRVRF vs KGLDF Comparison
Open Charts IRVRF vs KGLDFBanner chart's image
Irving Resources
Price$0.18
Change+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Volume$27.5K
Capitalization15.77M
King Global Ventures
Price$0.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization26.16M
IRVRF vs KGLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IRVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRVRF vs. KGLDF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRVRF is a Hold and KGLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (IRVRF: $0.18 vs. KGLDF: $0.62)
Brand notoriety: IRVRF and KGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRVRF: 56% vs. KGLDF: 23%
Market capitalization -- IRVRF: $15.77M vs. KGLDF: $26.16M
IRVRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.77M. KGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $26.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRVRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKGLDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IRVRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IRVRF and KGLDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IRVRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGLDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IRVRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • KGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGLDF is a better buy in the short-term than IRVRF.

Price Growth

IRVRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.70% price change this week, while KGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.61% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGLDF($26.2M) has a higher market cap than IRVRF($15.8M). KGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 120.329 vs. IRVRF (-1.494). IRVRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -951.35K vs. KGLDF (-2.92M). IRVRF has more cash in the bank: 4.62M vs. KGLDF (1.57M). IRVRF (0) and KGLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
IRVRFKGLDFIRVRF / KGLDF
Capitalization15.8M26.2M60%
EBITDA-951.35K-2.92M33%
Gain YTD-1.494120.329-1%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.62M1.57M294%
Total Debt122KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IRVRF vs KGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
IRVRF
KGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
9299
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6338
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IRVRF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGLDF (65). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGLDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (100). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

IRVRF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (99). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGLDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (63). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

KGLDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (100). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IRVRFKGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IRVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNBWY14.160.69
+5.14%
Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd.
NTPIF4.00N/A
N/A
Nam Tai Property Inc.
KEGX0.86N/A
N/A
Key Energy Services Inc. Del
PPAAF0.10N/A
N/A
PT Perusahaan Gas Negara Persaro
GWBK0.09N/A
N/A
Gateway Bank, F.S.B. (Oakland, CA)

IRVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRVRF and FSXLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRVRF and FSXLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRVRF
1D Price
Change %
IRVRF100%
+6.95%
FSXLF - IRVRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
CMCL - IRVRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
KDKGF - IRVRF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
JAGGF - IRVRF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
JUPGF - IRVRF
1%
Poorly correlated
-10.39%
More

KGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGLDF and KDKGF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGLDF and KDKGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGLDF
1D Price
Change %
KGLDF100%
-0.09%
KDKGF - KGLDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
IRVRF - KGLDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+6.95%
JUPGF - KGLDF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-10.39%
JAGGF - KGLDF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
JGLDF - KGLDF
-6%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%