IRVRF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.02 (+12.50%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
13.6M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KGLDF
Price
$0.44
Change
+$0.03 (+7.32%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
19.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IRVRF vs KGLDF

Header iconIRVRF vs KGLDF Comparison
Open Charts IRVRF vs KGLDFBanner chart's image
Irving Resources
Price$0.18
Change+$0.02 (+12.50%)
Volume$383.15K
Capitalization13.6M
King Global Ventures
Price$0.44
Change+$0.03 (+7.32%)
Volume$12.2K
Capitalization19.11M
IRVRF vs KGLDF Comparison Chart in %
IRVRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGLDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRVRF vs. KGLDF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRVRF is a StrongBuy and KGLDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (IRVRF: $0.18 vs. KGLDF: $0.44)
Brand notoriety: IRVRF and KGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRVRF: 644% vs. KGLDF: 62%
Market capitalization -- IRVRF: $13.6M vs. KGLDF: $19.11M
IRVRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.6M. KGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $19.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRVRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKGLDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IRVRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGLDF is a better buy in the long-term than IRVRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IRVRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGLDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IRVRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KGLDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IRVRF and KGLDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IRVRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.86% price change this week, while KGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGLDF($19.1M) has a higher market cap than IRVRF($13.6M). KGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 57.143 vs. IRVRF (-0.721). KGLDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.92M vs. IRVRF (-4.68M). IRVRF has more cash in the bank: 3.22M vs. KGLDF (1.57M). IRVRF (0) and KGLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
IRVRFKGLDFIRVRF / KGLDF
Capitalization13.6M19.1M71%
EBITDA-4.68M-2.92M160%
Gain YTD-0.72157.143-1%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.22M1.57M205%
Total Debt149KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IRVRF vs KGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
IRVRF
KGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1229
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IRVRF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (49). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

IRVRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (100). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

IRVRF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (98). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGLDF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (80). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

KGLDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (100). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IRVRFKGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IRVRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGLDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GREE1.930.04
+2.12%
Greenidge Generation Holdings
MEI7.270.15
+2.11%
Methode Electronics
GLXY29.860.34
+1.15%
Galaxy Digital Inc
TNGX9.10-0.07
-0.76%
Tango Therapeutics
DELL138.60-2.03
-1.44%
Dell Technologies

IRVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRVRF and NEM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRVRF and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRVRF
1D Price
Change %
IRVRF100%
+10.38%
NEM - IRVRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.32%
USAU - IRVRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
BTG - IRVRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THM - IRVRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+14.67%
CMCL - IRVRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.54%
More

KGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGLDF and NIOVF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGLDF and NIOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGLDF
1D Price
Change %
KGLDF100%
+6.80%
NIOVF - KGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAGGF - KGLDF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
KNTNF - KGLDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
KDKGF - KGLDF
4%
Poorly correlated
+11.01%
JGLDF - KGLDF
-7%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%