IRS
Price
$11.97
Change
-$0.75 (-5.90%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
995.99M
38 days until earnings call
RFL
Price
$1.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
47.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IRS vs RFL

Header iconIRS vs RFL Comparison
Open Charts IRS vs RFLBanner chart's image
IRSA Inversiones Y Representaciones S.A
Price$11.97
Change-$0.75 (-5.90%)
Volume$360.93K
Capitalization995.99M
Rafael Holdings
Price$1.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$62.75K
Capitalization47.74M
IRS vs RFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRS vs. RFL commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRS is a Hold and RFL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (IRS: $11.97 vs. RFL: $1.36)
Brand notoriety: IRS and RFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRS: 143% vs. RFL: 51%
Market capitalization -- IRS: $995.99M vs. RFL: $47.74M
IRS [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $995.99M. RFL’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $47.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRFL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IRS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RFL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IRS is a better buy in the long-term than RFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IRS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RFL is a better buy in the short-term than IRS.

Price Growth

IRS (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while RFL (@Real Estate Development) price change was -5.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

IRS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.47% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IRS($996M) has a higher market cap than RFL($47.7M). RFL has higher P/E ratio than IRS: RFL (14.80) vs IRS (7.24). RFL YTD gains are higher at: -17.576 vs. IRS (-19.826). IRS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 276B vs. RFL (-24.95M). IRS has more cash in the bank: 439B vs. RFL (37.9M). RFL has less debt than IRS: RFL (690K) vs IRS (691B). IRS has higher revenues than RFL: IRS (332B) vs RFL (732K).
IRSRFLIRS / RFL
Capitalization996M47.7M2,088%
EBITDA276B-24.95M-1,106,212%
Gain YTD-19.826-17.576113%
P/E Ratio7.2414.8049%
Revenue332B732K45,355,191%
Total Cash439B37.9M1,158,311%
Total Debt691B690K100,144,928%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IRS vs RFL: Fundamental Ratings
IRS
RFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6276
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29100
SMR RATING
1..100
5197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6288
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5862
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IRS's Valuation (8) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RFL (72). This means that IRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RFL’s over the last 12 months.

IRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for RFL (100). This means that IRS’s stock grew significantly faster than RFL’s over the last 12 months.

IRS's SMR Rating (51) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RFL (97). This means that IRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RFL’s over the last 12 months.

IRS's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RFL (88). This means that IRS’s stock grew similarly to RFL’s over the last 12 months.

IRS's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RFL (62). This means that IRS’s stock grew similarly to RFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IRSRFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNRRX62.710.61
+0.98%
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R
MNDGX15.590.15
+0.97%
MFS New Discovery R1
WBCCX10.840.05
+0.42%
TETON Westwood Balanced C
WBAIX17.040.07
+0.41%
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Instl Cl
TEQLX13.65-0.11
-0.80%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq Idx R6

RFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RFL and STHO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RFL and STHO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RFL
1D Price
Change %
RFL100%
N/A
STHO - RFL
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
HOUS - RFL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
IRS - RFL
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.90%
MMI - RFL
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
CSGP - RFL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More