IRRX
Price
$17.00
Change
-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
136.35M
SLAMF
Price
$11.72
Change
-$0.08 (-0.68%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
438.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IRRX vs SLAMF

Header iconIRRX vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts IRRX vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
Integrated Rail and Resources Acquisition
Price$17.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization136.35M
Slam
Price$11.72
Change-$0.08 (-0.68%)
Volume$9.42K
Capitalization438.8M
IRRX vs SLAMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IRRX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRRX vs. SLAMF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRRX is a Buy and SLAMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IRRX: $17.00 vs. SLAMF: $11.72)
Brand notoriety: IRRX and SLAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRRX: 176% vs. SLAMF: 43%
Market capitalization -- IRRX: $136.35M vs. SLAMF: $438.8M
IRRX [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $136.35M. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $438.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRRX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IRRX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IRRX is a better buy in the long-term than SLAMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IRRX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLAMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IRRX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SLAMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IRRX is a better buy in the short-term than SLAMF.

Price Growth

IRRX (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLAMF($439M) has a higher market cap than IRRX($136M). IRRX has higher P/E ratio than SLAMF: IRRX (153.85) vs SLAMF (65.00). IRRX YTD gains are higher at: 69.830 vs. SLAMF (3.260). IRRX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.08M vs. SLAMF (-3.36M). IRRX has more cash in the bank: 8.08K vs. SLAMF (3.34K). IRRX has less debt than SLAMF: IRRX (5.05M) vs SLAMF (10.2M). IRRX (0) and SLAMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
IRRXSLAMFIRRX / SLAMF
Capitalization136M439M31%
EBITDA-2.08M-3.36M62%
Gain YTD69.8303.2602,142%
P/E Ratio153.8565.00237%
Revenue00-
Total Cash8.08K3.34K242%
Total Debt5.05M10.2M50%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IRRXSLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
13%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IRRX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BFTHX62.311.01
+1.65%
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
PIOTX24.500.15
+0.62%
Victory Pioneer Core Equity A
LZSCX11.470.07
+0.61%
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Instl
STESX15.730.04
+0.25%
Bernstein International Strat Eqs SCB
PMIYX10.900.01
+0.09%
Putnam Multi-Asset Income Y

IRRX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRRX and SLAMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRRX and SLAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRRX
1D Price
Change %
IRRX100%
N/A
SLAMF - IRRX
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOREF - IRRX
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRTUF - IRRX
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLUF - IRRX
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRACF - IRRX
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A

SLAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAMF has been loosely correlated with KACLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLAMF jumps, then KACLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAMF
1D Price
Change %
SLAMF100%
N/A
KACLF - SLAMF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MNTN - SLAMF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
PEGR - SLAMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRRX - SLAMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IWSH - SLAMF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More