IROQ
Price
$24.28
Change
-$0.26 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
55.79M
OTPBF
Price
$50.00
Change
+$0.58 (+1.17%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
10.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IROQ vs OTPBF

Header iconIROQ vs OTPBF Comparison
Open Charts IROQ vs OTPBFBanner chart's image
IF Ban
Price$24.28
Change-$0.26 (-1.06%)
Volume$295
Capitalization55.79M
OTP Bank
Price$50.00
Change+$0.58 (+1.17%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.23B
IROQ vs OTPBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IROQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IROQ vs. OTPBF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IROQ is a StrongBuy and OTPBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IROQ: $24.28 vs. OTPBF: $50.00)
Brand notoriety: IROQ and OTPBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IROQ: 20% vs. OTPBF: 100%
Market capitalization -- IROQ: $55.79M vs. OTPBF: $10.23B
IROQ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $55.79M. OTPBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IROQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOTPBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IROQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OTPBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OTPBF is a better buy in the long-term than IROQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IROQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IROQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

IROQ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.62% price change this week, while OTPBF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.15% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OTPBF($10.2B) has a higher market cap than IROQ($55.8M). IROQ has higher P/E ratio than OTPBF: IROQ (27.30) vs OTPBF (4.46). IROQ YTD gains are higher at: 5.074 vs. OTPBF (0.000). IROQ has less debt than OTPBF: IROQ (132M) vs OTPBF (1.71T). OTPBF has higher revenues than IROQ: OTPBF (1.99T) vs IROQ (22.7M).
IROQOTPBFIROQ / OTPBF
Capitalization55.8M10.2B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.0740.000-
P/E Ratio27.304.46612%
Revenue22.7M1.99T0%
Total Cash7.87MN/A-
Total Debt132M1.71T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IROQ vs OTPBF: Fundamental Ratings
IROQ
OTPBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4959
SMR RATING
1..100
761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6942
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OTPBF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as IROQ (61) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that OTPBF’s stock grew similarly to IROQ’s over the last 12 months.

IROQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as OTPBF (59) in the null industry. This means that IROQ’s stock grew similarly to OTPBF’s over the last 12 months.

OTPBF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IROQ (76) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that OTPBF’s stock grew significantly faster than IROQ’s over the last 12 months.

IROQ's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as OTPBF (59) in the null industry. This means that IROQ’s stock grew similarly to OTPBF’s over the last 12 months.

OTPBF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as IROQ (69) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that OTPBF’s stock grew similarly to IROQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IROQOTPBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
53%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IROQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFXDF19.050.39
+2.09%
Fairfax India Hldgs Corp
SEAC4.65N/A
N/A
SeaChange International, Inc.
HMLPF16.88N/A
N/A
Hoegh LNG Partners LP
SYZLF6.16-0.04
-0.65%
Sylogist Ltd.
JPXGY10.40-0.09
-0.86%
Japan Exchange Group, Inc.

IROQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IROQ and OTPBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IROQ and OTPBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IROQ
1D Price
Change %
IROQ100%
-1.06%
OTPBF - IROQ
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSVB - IROQ
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
PBFS - IROQ
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
OSBK - IROQ
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BANFP - IROQ
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OTPBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OTPBF has been closely correlated with MSVB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OTPBF jumps, then MSVB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OTPBF
1D Price
Change %
OTPBF100%
N/A
MSVB - OTPBF
89%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
WOBK - OTPBF
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
MFDB - OTPBF
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FTFI - OTPBF
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSBX - OTPBF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More