IRON
Price
$87.16
Change
-$2.78 (-3.09%)
Updated
Oct 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.13B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
NAMS
Price
$37.66
Change
+$1.26 (+3.46%)
Updated
Oct 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.1B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IRON vs NAMS

Header iconIRON vs NAMS Comparison
Open Charts IRON vs NAMSBanner chart's image
Disc Medicine
Price$87.16
Change-$2.78 (-3.09%)
Volume$35.16K
Capitalization3.13B
NewAmsterdam Pharma
Price$37.66
Change+$1.26 (+3.46%)
Volume$39.07K
Capitalization4.1B
IRON vs NAMS Comparison Chart in %
IRON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRON vs. NAMS commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRON is a Hold and NAMS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (IRON: $89.94 vs. NAMS: $36.40)
Brand notoriety: IRON and NAMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRON: 578% vs. NAMS: 148%
Market capitalization -- IRON: $3.13B vs. NAMS: $4.1B
IRON [@Biotechnology] is valued at $3.13B. NAMS’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $4.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $106.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRON’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNAMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IRON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NAMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IRON is a better buy in the long-term than NAMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IRON’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAMS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IRON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NAMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IRON is a better buy in the short-term than NAMS.

Price Growth

IRON (@Biotechnology) experienced а +28.67% price change this week, while NAMS (@Biotechnology) price change was -1.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +4.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

IRON is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

NAMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+4.76% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAMS($4.1B) has a higher market cap than IRON($3.13B). IRON (41.861) and NAMS (41.634) have similar YTD gains . IRON has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -142.42M vs. NAMS (-237.93M). NAMS has more cash in the bank: 739M vs. IRON (650M). NAMS has less debt than IRON: NAMS (328K) vs IRON (30.9M). NAMS has higher revenues than IRON: NAMS (64M) vs IRON (0).
IRONNAMSIRON / NAMS
Capitalization3.13B4.1B76%
EBITDA-142.42M-237.93M60%
Gain YTD41.86141.634101%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue064M-
Total Cash650M739M88%
Total Debt30.9M328K9,421%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IRONNAMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IRON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AALRX28.970.17
+0.59%
American Beacon Large Cap Value R6
SBASX12.830.04
+0.31%
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins
RNGCX72.070.04
+0.06%
American Funds New Economy R3
BSMAX18.18-0.03
-0.16%
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Idx Inv A
FLXSX17.68-0.10
-0.56%
Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index

IRON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRON has been loosely correlated with NUVL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IRON jumps, then NUVL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRON
1D Price
Change %
IRON100%
+20.95%
NUVL - IRON
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
KMSTF - IRON
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IDYA - IRON
51%
Loosely correlated
+5.67%
SYRE - IRON
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
CGON - IRON
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
More

NAMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAMS has been loosely correlated with CRDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NAMS jumps, then CRDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAMS
1D Price
Change %
NAMS100%
-0.19%
CRDF - NAMS
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
BEAM - NAMS
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
AURA - NAMS
37%
Loosely correlated
-8.40%
QURE - NAMS
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
IDYA - NAMS
37%
Loosely correlated
+5.67%
More