IROHU
Price
$10.95
Change
-$0.05 (-0.45%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
SVII
Price
$11.95
Change
+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
117.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IROHU vs SVII

Header iconIROHU vs SVII Comparison
Open Charts IROHU vs SVIIBanner chart's image
Iron Horse Acquisitions
Price$10.95
Change-$0.05 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Spring Valley Acquisition
Price$11.95
Change+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Volume$29.85K
Capitalization117.04M
IROHU vs SVII Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IROHU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IROHU vs. SVII commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IROHU is a Hold and SVII is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (IROHU: $11.00 vs. SVII: $11.87)
Brand notoriety: IROHU and SVII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IROHU: 13% vs. SVII: 60%
Market capitalization -- IROHU: $0 vs. SVII: $117.04M
IROHU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. SVII’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $117.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $163.89M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IROHU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVII’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IROHU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IROHU is a better buy in the long-term than SVII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IROHU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVII’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IROHU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SVII’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IROHU is a better buy in the short-term than SVII.

Price Growth

IROHU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SVII (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.04% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVII YTD gains are higher at: 6.084 vs. IROHU (3.970). SVII has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -764.76K vs. IROHU (-1.75M). SVII has more cash in the bank: 262K vs. IROHU (88). SVII has less debt than IROHU: SVII (1.5M) vs IROHU (1.83M). IROHU (0) and SVII (0) have equivalent revenues.
IROHUSVIIIROHU / SVII
CapitalizationN/A117M-
EBITDA-1.75M-764.76K229%
Gain YTD3.9706.08465%
P/E RatioN/A62.87-
Revenue00-
Total Cash88262K0%
Total Debt1.83M1.5M122%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IROHUSVII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
2%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
5%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
14%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
2%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
5%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IROHU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ILXP0.02N/A
N/A
International Luxury Products, Inc.
MFBP19.06N/A
N/A
M&F Bancorp, Inc.
KDKWF23.20N/A
N/A
KADOKAWA CORP.
LNVGF1.42-0.07
-4.70%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
TCYSF27.16-1.40
-4.90%
Tecsys Inc.

IROHU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IROHU has been loosely correlated with IROH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IROHU jumps, then IROH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IROHU
1D Price
Change %
IROHU100%
N/A
IROH - IROHU
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.77%
BAYA - IROHU
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMYY - IROHU
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
FORLU - IROHU
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRLU - IROHU
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SVII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVII and PLAOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVII and PLAOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVII
1D Price
Change %
SVII100%
+0.63%
PLAOF - SVII
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QETAU - SVII
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IROHU - SVII
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IROH - SVII
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
AIMUF - SVII
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More