IROH
Price
$10.53
Change
+$0.06 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
88.81M
ISRLU
Price
$13.99
Change
-$0.41 (-2.85%)
Updated
Jun 16, 11:38 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

IROH vs ISRLU

Header iconIROH vs ISRLU Comparison
Open Charts IROH vs ISRLUBanner chart's image
Iron Horse Acquisitions
Price$10.53
Change+$0.06 (+0.57%)
Volume$66.3K
Capitalization88.81M
Israel Acquisitions
Price$13.99
Change-$0.41 (-2.85%)
Volume$201
CapitalizationN/A
IROH vs ISRLU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IROH vs. ISRLU commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IROH is a StrongBuy and ISRLU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (IROH: $10.53 vs. ISRLU: $13.99)
Brand notoriety: IROH and ISRLU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IROH: 266% vs. ISRLU: 33%
Market capitalization -- IROH: $88.81M vs. ISRLU: $0
IROH [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $88.81M. ISRLU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IROH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileISRLU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IROH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ISRLU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ISRLU is a better buy in the long-term than IROH.

Price Growth

IROH (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while ISRLU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -2.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.43% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISRLU YTD gains are higher at: 23.696 vs. IROH (2.332).
IROHISRLUIROH / ISRLU
Capitalization88.8MN/A-
EBITDAN/A-1.05M-
Gain YTD2.33223.69610%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A672K-
Total DebtN/A157K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TUG35.090.54
+1.58%
STF Tactical Growth ETF
CMJAX41.410.44
+1.07%
Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx A
FLQM53.830.42
+0.79%
Franklin US Mid Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
ETMGX30.460.20
+0.66%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Small-Cap A
DBND45.54-0.10
-0.23%
DoubleLine Opportunistic Core Bond ETF

IROH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IROH and QETA have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IROH and QETA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IROH
1D Price
Change %
IROH100%
+0.57%
QETA - IROH
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRLU - IROH
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.85%
JVSA - IROH
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
NETD - IROH
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
SPKL - IROH
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
More

ISRLU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISRLU has been loosely correlated with ALCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ISRLU jumps, then ALCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISRLU
1D Price
Change %
ISRLU100%
-2.85%
ALCY - ISRLU
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TLGUF - ISRLU
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLUF - ISRLU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KACLF - ISRLU
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACT - ISRLU
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More