Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IRGFX vs WCMLX
IRGFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts IRGFX vs WCMLX
Nomura Small Cap Growth R6
Price$25.48
Change+$0.29 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
IRGFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IRGFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRGFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IRGFX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). IRGFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . IRGFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: IRGFX (11 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than IRGFX (0.92). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. IRGFX (76.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than IRGFX: WCMLX (100000) vs IRGFX (1000000). IRGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.23 vs. WCMLX (-1.14). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. IRGFX (-14.83).
| IRGFX | WCMLX | IRGFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.99 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.79 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.389 | 7.621 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 44.4M | 2,482% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.23 | -1.14 | -282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.15 | 21.83 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.83 | 1.99 | -746% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement