Advertisement
IQST vs SFTBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IQST is a Hold and SFTBY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IQST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSFTBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IQST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SFTBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IQST’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFTBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IQST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SFTBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
IQST (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -4.38% price change this week, while SFTBY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -8.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
SFTBY is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (-0.03% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| IQST | SFTBY | IQST / SFTBY | |
| Capitalization | 13.2M | 146B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -4.48M | 5.45T | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -2.406 | -10.476 | 23% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 7.52 | - |
| Revenue | 332M | 7.51T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 2.26M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 4.09M | N/A | - |
IQST | SFTBY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IQST's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SFTBY (99). This means that IQST’s stock grew similarly to SFTBY’s over the last 12 months.
SFTBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as IQST (80). This means that SFTBY’s stock grew similarly to IQST’s over the last 12 months.
IQST's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as SFTBY (100). This means that IQST’s stock grew similarly to SFTBY’s over the last 12 months.
IQST's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SFTBY (47). This means that IQST’s stock grew similarly to SFTBY’s over the last 12 months.
SFTBY's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IQST (100). This means that SFTBY’s stock grew significantly faster than IQST’s over the last 12 months.
| IQST | SFTBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
Advertisement
IQST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IQST and CHT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IQST and CHT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQST | 100% | -2.41% | ||
| CHT - IQST | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| LLEIF - IQST | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FNGR - IQST | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.17% | ||
| SFTBY - IQST | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.08% | ||
| IIJIF - IQST | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SFTBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFTBY has been closely correlated with SFTBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFTBY jumps, then SFTBF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFTBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFTBY | 100% | -4.08% | ||
| SFTBF - SFTBY | 73% Closely correlated | -4.71% | ||
| TLGPY - SFTBY | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| KT - SFTBY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| RBBN - SFTBY | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WOW - SFTBY | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||