IPXHF
Price
$16.36
Change
+$0.37 (+2.31%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
19.49B
JRNGF
Price
$2.39
Change
+$0.03 (+1.27%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
161.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPXHF vs JRNGF

Header iconIPXHF vs JRNGF Comparison
Open Charts IPXHF vs JRNGFBanner chart's image
Inpex
Price$16.36
Change+$0.37 (+2.31%)
Volume$86
Capitalization19.49B
Journey Energy
Price$2.39
Change+$0.03 (+1.27%)
Volume$50.95K
Capitalization161.72M
IPXHF vs JRNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPXHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JRNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPXHF vs. JRNGF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPXHF is a Hold and JRNGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (IPXHF: $16.36 vs. JRNGF: $2.39)
Brand notoriety: IPXHF and JRNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPXHF: 19% vs. JRNGF: 107%
Market capitalization -- IPXHF: $19.49B vs. JRNGF: $161.72M
IPXHF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $19.49B. JRNGF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $161.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $123B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPXHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileJRNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IPXHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • JRNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPXHF is a better buy in the long-term than JRNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPXHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JRNGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPXHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JRNGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IPXHF is a better buy in the short-term than JRNGF.

Price Growth

IPXHF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +3.74% price change this week, while JRNGF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +5.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.79% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPXHF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than JRNGF($162M). JRNGF has higher P/E ratio than IPXHF: JRNGF (13.29) vs IPXHF (6.71). JRNGF YTD gains are higher at: 81.061 vs. IPXHF (17.444). IPXHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.68T vs. JRNGF (69.1M). IPXHF has more cash in the bank: 597B vs. JRNGF (271K). JRNGF has less debt than IPXHF: JRNGF (52.4M) vs IPXHF (1.1T). IPXHF has higher revenues than JRNGF: IPXHF (2.12T) vs JRNGF (198M).
IPXHFJRNGFIPXHF / JRNGF
Capitalization19.5B162M12,037%
EBITDA1.68T69.1M2,425,470%
Gain YTD17.44481.06122%
P/E Ratio6.7113.2951%
Revenue2.12T198M1,072,727%
Total Cash597B271K220,295,203%
Total Debt1.1T52.4M2,095,420%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPXHF vs JRNGF: Fundamental Ratings
IPXHF
JRNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2870
SMR RATING
1..100
286
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5245
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5018

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPXHF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JRNGF (64). This means that IPXHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JRNGF’s over the last 12 months.

IPXHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JRNGF (70). This means that IPXHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JRNGF’s over the last 12 months.

IPXHF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JRNGF (86). This means that IPXHF’s stock grew significantly faster than JRNGF’s over the last 12 months.

JRNGF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as IPXHF (45). This means that JRNGF’s stock grew similarly to IPXHF’s over the last 12 months.

JRNGF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as IPXHF (52). This means that JRNGF’s stock grew similarly to IPXHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPXHFJRNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPXHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JRNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WWLAX14.240.11
+0.78%
Westwood Quality Value Fund A
RYFIX107.070.74
+0.70%
Rydex Financial Services Inv
FTTEX14.440.07
+0.49%
Fidelity Advisor Total Intl Equity M
NSBFX67.550.32
+0.48%
Nuveen Dividend Growth R6
MRBPX24.220.08
+0.33%
BlackRock Balanced R

IPXHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IPXHF and OODH have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPXHF and OODH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPXHF
1D Price
Change %
IPXHF100%
N/A
OODH - IPXHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HZNFF - IPXHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPXHY - IPXHF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
IPCFF - IPXHF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRNGF - IPXHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
More

JRNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JRNGF has been loosely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JRNGF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JRNGF
1D Price
Change %
JRNGF100%
+1.27%
ZPTAF - JRNGF
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
TNEYF - JRNGF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
AETUF - JRNGF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
PEYUF - JRNGF
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
TRMLF - JRNGF
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
More