Advertisement
IPWR vs XPON
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPWR is a Hold and XPON is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IPWR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXPON’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IPWR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- XPON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IPWR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPON’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IPWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- XPON’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
IPWR (@Semiconductors) experienced а +2.84% price change this week, while XPON (@Electrical Products) price change was +2.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -4.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.50%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
IPWR is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (-4.23% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
@Electrical Products (-1.96% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
| IPWR | XPON | IPWR / XPON | |
| Capitalization | 30.8M | 11.4M | 270% |
| EBITDA | -11.18M | -10.96M | 102% |
| Gain YTD | -32.848 | -46.862 | 70% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 0.03 | - |
| Revenue | 19.2K | 8.41M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 11.1M | 685K | 1,620% |
| Total Debt | 446K | 1.08M | 41% |
IPWR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IPWR | XPON | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
IPWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPWR and SOL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPWR and SOL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPWR | 100% | +9.50% | ||
| SOL - IPWR | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.60% | ||
| CSIQ - IPWR | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.50% | ||
| SLDP - IPWR | 30% Poorly correlated | -6.06% | ||
| MRVL - IPWR | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HUBB - IPWR | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||
XPON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPON has been loosely correlated with ZMTBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XPON jumps, then ZMTBY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XPON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPON | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZMTBY - XPON | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| KE - XPON | 32% Poorly correlated | +5.52% | ||
| EAF - XPON | 28% Poorly correlated | +7.92% | ||
| IPWR - XPON | 26% Poorly correlated | +9.50% | ||
| FUWAY - XPON | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||