IPSOF
Price
$53.56
Change
+$1.56 (+3.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.19B
SCTBY
Price
$15.10
Change
+$0.28 (+1.89%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.9B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPSOF vs SCTBY

Header iconIPSOF vs SCTBY Comparison
Open Charts IPSOF vs SCTBYBanner chart's image
IPSOS
Price$53.56
Change+$1.56 (+3.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.19B
Securitas A B
Price$15.10
Change+$0.28 (+1.89%)
Volume$615
Capitalization5.9B
IPSOF vs SCTBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPSOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPSOF vs. SCTBY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPSOF is a Hold and SCTBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IPSOF: $53.56 vs. SCTBY: $15.10)
Brand notoriety: IPSOF and SCTBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPSOF: 47% vs. SCTBY: 237%
Market capitalization -- IPSOF: $2.19B vs. SCTBY: $5.9B
IPSOF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.19B. SCTBY’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $5.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPSOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCTBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IPSOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCTBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPSOF is a better buy in the long-term than SCTBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPSOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCTBY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPSOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SCTBY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IPSOF is a better buy in the short-term than SCTBY.

Price Growth

IPSOF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while SCTBY (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.86% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCTBY($5.9B) has a higher market cap than IPSOF($2.19B). SCTBY has higher P/E ratio than IPSOF: SCTBY (49.75) vs IPSOF (11.55). SCTBY YTD gains are higher at: 21.574 vs. IPSOF (-14.070). SCTBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.51B vs. IPSOF (401M). SCTBY has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. IPSOF (386M). IPSOF has less debt than SCTBY: IPSOF (587M) vs SCTBY (46.5B). SCTBY has higher revenues than IPSOF: SCTBY (157B) vs IPSOF (2.41B).
IPSOFSCTBYIPSOF / SCTBY
Capitalization2.19B5.9B37%
EBITDA401M9.51B4%
Gain YTD-14.07021.574-65%
P/E Ratio11.5549.7523%
Revenue2.41B157B2%
Total Cash386M7.94B5%
Total Debt587M46.5B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPSOF vs SCTBY: Fundamental Ratings
IPSOF
SCTBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38100
SMR RATING
1..100
6257
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3059

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPSOF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as SCTBY (21). This means that IPSOF’s stock grew similarly to SCTBY’s over the last 12 months.

IPSOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCTBY (100). This means that IPSOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCTBY’s over the last 12 months.

SCTBY's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as IPSOF (62). This means that SCTBY’s stock grew similarly to IPSOF’s over the last 12 months.

SCTBY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as IPSOF (54). This means that SCTBY’s stock grew similarly to IPSOF’s over the last 12 months.

IPSOF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SCTBY (98). This means that IPSOF’s stock grew similarly to SCTBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPSOFSCTBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPSOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRTGX406.164.84
+1.21%
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index I
AMPFX44.040.46
+1.06%
American Funds AMCAP F1
SPICX63.100.53
+0.85%
Invesco S&P 500 Index C
PHLOX10.180.03
+0.30%
Philotimo Focused Growth and Income
NARCX65.380.15
+0.23%
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp C

IPSOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IPSOF and SCTBY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPSOF and SCTBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPSOF
1D Price
Change %
IPSOF100%
N/A
SCTBY - IPSOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IKTSY - IPSOF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
IVDA - IPSOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
GKPRF - IPSOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
ICTSF - IPSOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCTBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCTBY and IPSOF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCTBY and IPSOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCTBY
1D Price
Change %
SCTBY100%
N/A
IPSOF - SCTBY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INPOY - SCTBY
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
FA - SCTBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
EUBG - SCTBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EEIQ - SCTBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More