Advertisement
IPSOF vs KMNCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPSOF is a Hold and KMNCF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IPSOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IPSOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KMNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IPSOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMNCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IPSOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
- KMNCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
IPSOF (@Data Processing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KMNCF (@Data Processing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Data Processing Services (-1.50% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| IPSOF | KMNCF | IPSOF / KMNCF | |
| Capitalization | 1.92B | 66.3M | 2,897% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 11M | - |
| Gain YTD | -30.210 | 125.937 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.08 | 7.59 | 120% |
| Revenue | N/A | 361M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 78.2M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 22.5M | - |
IPSOF | KMNCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IPSOF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as KMNCF (5). This means that IPSOF’s stock grew similarly to KMNCF’s over the last 12 months.
KMNCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPSOF (55). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPSOF’s over the last 12 months.
IPSOF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as KMNCF (89). This means that IPSOF’s stock grew similarly to KMNCF’s over the last 12 months.
KMNCF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPSOF (85). This means that KMNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPSOF’s over the last 12 months.
IPSOF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as KMNCF (96). This means that IPSOF’s stock grew similarly to KMNCF’s over the last 12 months.
| IPSOF | KMNCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 14% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 20% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 15% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 17% | 4 days ago 22% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 10% | 4 days ago 20% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 20% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 6% | 4 days ago 13% |
Advertisement
IPSOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPSOF and SCTBY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPSOF and SCTBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPSOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPSOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SCTBY - IPSOF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IKTSY - IPSOF | 12% Poorly correlated | +3.71% | ||
| IVDA - IPSOF | 5% Poorly correlated | -6.59% | ||
| GKPRF - IPSOF | 4% Poorly correlated | -4.40% | ||
| ICTSF - IPSOF | 3% Poorly correlated | +5.56% | ||
More | ||||
KMNCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KMNCF and SKIL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMNCF and SKIL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMNCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMNCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SKIL - KMNCF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| LOIMF - KMNCF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IKTSY - KMNCF | 4% Poorly correlated | +3.71% | ||
| IPSOF - KMNCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KBRLF - KMNCF | 0% Poorly correlated | +8.66% | ||
More | ||||