Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOCX vs RNWHX
IPOCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWHX
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$17.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets668.4M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$95.66
Change-$0.26 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
IPOCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. IPOCX (668M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: IPOCX (1.91) vs RNWHX (1.33). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: IPOCX (30 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). IPOCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOCX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWHX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.86 vs. IPOCX (20.75). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. IPOCX (-23.92).
| IPOCX | RNWHX | IPOCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.72 | 250% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.72 | 311% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.204 | 4.057 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 668M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.33 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.75 | 28.86 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.41 | 42.44 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.92 | 13.21 | -181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.60 | 121.60 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement