Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOCX vs RNWHX
IPOCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWHX
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$16.42
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets647.07M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$91.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
IPOCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. IPOCX (647M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: IPOCX (3.14) vs RNWHX (0.91). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: IPOCX (30 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). IPOCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOCX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWHX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.96 vs. IPOCX (8.89). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.37 vs. IPOCX (-22.23).
| IPOCX | RNWHX | IPOCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.72 | 250% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.72 | 311% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.349 | 20.889 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 647M | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.14 | 0.91 | 346% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.89 | 18.96 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.19 | 44.08 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.23 | 11.37 | -195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.54 | 90.22 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers