Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOCX vs RNWHX
IPOCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWHX
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$18.79
Change+$0.20 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets698.26M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$99.67
Change+$0.51 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.7B
IPOCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 79.7B vs. IPOCX (698M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: IPOCX (1.76) vs RNWHX (1.25). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: IPOCX (30 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). IPOCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. IPOCX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWHX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.49 vs. IPOCX (26.12). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 9.87 vs. IPOCX (-22.36).
| IPOCX | RNWHX | IPOCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.72 | 250% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.72 | 311% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.853 | 8.419 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 698M | 79.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.25 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.12 | 28.49 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.21 | 48.86 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.36 | 9.87 | -227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.51 | 135.68 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers