Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOCX vs RNWBX
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWBX
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$18.79
Change+$0.20 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets698.26M
American Funds New World R2
Price$96.08
Change+$0.48 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.7B
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 79.7B vs. IPOCX (698M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOCX (1.76) vs RNWBX (0.45). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOCX (30 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). IPOCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. IPOCX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). RNWBX (27.06) and IPOCX (26.12) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.27 vs. IPOCX (-22.36).
| IPOCX | RNWBX | IPOCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.66 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.66 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.853 | 8.284 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 698M | 79.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 0.45 | 390% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.12 | 27.06 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.21 | 44.24 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.36 | 5.27 | -424% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.51 | 125.08 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement