Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOCX vs RNWBX
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq C
Price$18.47
Change-$0.18 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets690.49M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.33
Change-$1.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. IPOCX (690M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOCX (3.06) vs RNWBX (0.12). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOCX (30 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). IPOCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOCX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). IPOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.70 vs. RNWBX (20.32). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.37 vs. IPOCX (-6.12).
| IPOCX | RNWBX | IPOCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.67 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.67 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.336 | 27.152 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 690M | 76.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.06 | 0.12 | 2,605% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.70 | 20.32 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.07 | 47.10 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.12 | 21.37 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.71 | 93.86 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers