Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOCX vs RNWBX
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWBX
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$16.42
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets647.07M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
IPOCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. IPOCX (647M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOCX (3.14) vs RNWBX (0.12). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOCX (30 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). IPOCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOCX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.68 vs. IPOCX (8.89). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.66 vs. IPOCX (-22.23).
| IPOCX | RNWBX | IPOCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.67 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.67 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.349 | 20.612 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 647M | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.14 | 0.12 | 2,658% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.89 | 18.68 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.19 | 40.84 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.23 | 7.66 | -290% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.54 | 83.29 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement