Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOCX vs RNWAX
IPOCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts IPOCX vs RNWAX
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$18.79
Change+$0.20 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets698.26M
American Funds New World R1
Price$96.13
Change+$0.49 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.7B
IPOCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Feb 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOCX is a Hold and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 79.7B vs. IPOCX (698M). IPOCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: IPOCX (1.76) vs RNWAX (0.53). IPOCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: IPOCX (30 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). IPOCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. IPOCX (28.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOCX: RNWAX (250) vs IPOCX (1000). RNWAX (27.10) and IPOCX (26.12) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.28 vs. IPOCX (-22.36).
| IPOCX | RNWAX | IPOCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.66 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.66 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.853 | 8.303 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 698M | 79.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 0.53 | 331% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.12 | 27.10 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.21 | 44.29 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.36 | 5.28 | -424% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.51 | 125.03 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers