Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOAX vs RNWHX
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWHX
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq A
Price$22.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets668.4M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$95.66
Change-$0.26 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. IPOAX (668M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: IPOAX (2.11) vs RNWHX (1.33). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: IPOAX (32 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). IPOAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOAX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWHX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.86 vs. IPOAX (24.09). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. IPOAX (-16.81).
| IPOAX | RNWHX | IPOAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.72 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.253 | 4.057 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 668M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 1.33 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.09 | 28.86 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.94 | 42.44 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.81 | 13.21 | -127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.33 | 121.60 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement