Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOAX vs RNWHX
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWHX
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq A
Price$23.37
Change+$0.72 (+3.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets688.07M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
IPOAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. IPOAX (688M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: IPOAX (1.93) vs RNWHX (1.25). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: IPOAX (32 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). IPOAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. IPOAX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWHX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). IPOAX (29.05) and RNWHX (27.68) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. IPOAX (-14.35).
| IPOAX | RNWHX | IPOAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.72 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.444 | 6.092 | 171% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 688M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.25 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.05 | 27.68 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.25 | 43.24 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.35 | 11.69 | -123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.15 | 124.21 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers