Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPOAX vs RNWBX
IPOAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts IPOAX vs RNWBX
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq A
Price$22.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets668.4M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.29
Change-$0.25 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
IPOAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPOAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. IPOAX (668M). IPOAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: IPOAX (2.11) vs RNWBX (0.48). IPOAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: IPOAX (32 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than IPOAX (1.49). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. IPOAX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than IPOAX: RNWBX (250) vs IPOAX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.41 vs. IPOAX (24.09). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.47 vs. IPOAX (-16.81).
| IPOAX | RNWBX | IPOAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.67 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.253 | 4.294 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 668M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 0.48 | 443% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.09 | 28.41 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.94 | 38.40 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.81 | 7.47 | -225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.33 | 112.28 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers