IPOAF
Price
$27.00
Change
+$1.25 (+4.85%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.71B
22 days until earnings call
JMXXF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$1.96 (-93.33%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
260.95M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPOAF vs JMXXF

Header iconIPOAF vs JMXXF Comparison
Open Charts IPOAF vs JMXXFBanner chart's image
Industrias Penoles S.A. de C.V
Price$27.00
Change+$1.25 (+4.85%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization5.71B
Jupiter Mines
Price$0.14
Change-$1.96 (-93.33%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization260.95M
IPOAF vs JMXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPOAF vs. JMXXF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPOAF is a Buy and JMXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IPOAF: $27.00 vs. JMXXF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: IPOAF and JMXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPOAF: 211% vs. JMXXF: 604%
Market capitalization -- IPOAF: $5.71B vs. JMXXF: $260.95M
IPOAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.71B. JMXXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $260.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPOAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJMXXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IPOAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JMXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JMXXF is a better buy in the long-term than IPOAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPOAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JMXXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPOAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JMXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JMXXF is a better buy in the short-term than IPOAF.

Price Growth

IPOAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.47% price change this week, while JMXXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -93.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

IPOAF is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPOAF($5.71B) has a higher market cap than JMXXF($261M). IPOAF has higher P/E ratio than JMXXF: IPOAF (46.95) vs JMXXF (4.62). IPOAF YTD gains are higher at: 116.000 vs. JMXXF (40.000). IPOAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 924M vs. JMXXF (59.4M). IPOAF has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. JMXXF (60.6M). JMXXF has less debt than IPOAF: JMXXF (42.5M) vs IPOAF (3.19B).
IPOAFJMXXFIPOAF / JMXXF
Capitalization5.71B261M2,189%
EBITDA924M59.4M1,556%
Gain YTD116.00040.000290%
P/E Ratio46.954.621,016%
Revenue5.53BN/A-
Total Cash1.75B60.6M2,889%
Total Debt3.19B42.5M7,513%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPOAF vs JMXXF: Fundamental Ratings
IPOAF
JMXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28100
SMR RATING
1..100
7975
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3662
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JMXXF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPOAF (72). This means that JMXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than IPOAF’s over the last 12 months.

IPOAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JMXXF (100). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew significantly faster than JMXXF’s over the last 12 months.

JMXXF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as IPOAF (79). This means that JMXXF’s stock grew similarly to IPOAF’s over the last 12 months.

IPOAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as JMXXF (62). This means that IPOAF’s stock grew similarly to JMXXF’s over the last 12 months.

JMXXF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPOAF (87). This means that JMXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPOAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPOAFJMXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASCYX10.800.12
+1.12%
Alger Small Cap Growth Y
WQAUX12.150.08
+0.66%
Westwood Quality AllCap Ultra
FSTRX34.010.22
+0.65%
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value A
FIQBX29.680.12
+0.41%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Z
PZFVX25.550.06
+0.24%
JHancock Classic Value A

IPOAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOAF and EMOTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOAF and EMOTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPOAF
1D Price
Change %
IPOAF100%
+4.85%
EMOTF - IPOAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
IVPAF - IPOAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
FWEDF - IPOAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
IPGDF - IPOAF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
JMXXF - IPOAF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JMXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JMXXF has been loosely correlated with MMLTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JMXXF jumps, then MMLTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMXXF
1D Price
Change %
JMXXF100%
N/A
MMLTF - JMXXF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NBRFF - JMXXF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFBOF - JMXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPOAF - JMXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+4.85%
IPGDF - JMXXF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
More