Advertisement
IPHA vs TNXP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPHA is a Hold and TNXP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IPHA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNXP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IPHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TNXP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IPHA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNXP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IPHA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TNXP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IPHA (@Biotechnology) experienced а +4.29% price change this week, while TNXP (@Biotechnology) price change was +10.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +5.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
IPHA is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.
TNXP is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (+5.94% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| IPHA | TNXP | IPHA / TNXP | |
| Capitalization | 209M | 450M | 46% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -66.23M | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.022 | 55.700 | 34% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 0.02 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 10M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 132M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 563K | - |
IPHA | TNXP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TNXP's Valuation (35) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPHA (76) in the null industry. This means that TNXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPHA’s over the last 12 months.
TNXP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as IPHA (100) in the null industry. This means that TNXP’s stock grew similarly to IPHA’s over the last 12 months.
TNXP's SMR Rating (98) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as IPHA (98) in the null industry. This means that TNXP’s stock grew similarly to IPHA’s over the last 12 months.
TNXP's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as IPHA (45) in the null industry. This means that TNXP’s stock grew similarly to IPHA’s over the last 12 months.
IPHA's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TNXP (98) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that IPHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than TNXP’s over the last 12 months.
| IPHA | TNXP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JIEZX | 22.34 | 0.11 | +0.49% |
| JPMorgan International Equity R2 | |||
| LASGX | 16.47 | 0.06 | +0.37% |
| Lord Abbett International Growth R4 | |||
| QLSGX | 30.31 | 0.04 | +0.13% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth R6 | |||
| CSIFX | 47.17 | -0.12 | -0.25% |
| Calvert Balanced A | |||
| ENHCX | 10.46 | -0.03 | -0.29% |
| Cullen Enhanced Equity Income C | |||
IPHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPHA and TNXP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPHA and TNXP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPHA | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| TNXP - IPHA | 30% Poorly correlated | -13.81% | ||
| TECH - IPHA | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| QSI - IPHA | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
| QURE - IPHA | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.53% | ||
| ENTA - IPHA | 25% Poorly correlated | +3.36% | ||
More | ||||
TNXP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNXP has been closely correlated with NCNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNXP jumps, then NCNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNXP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNXP | 100% | -13.81% | ||
| NCNA - TNXP | 90% Closely correlated | -10.12% | ||
| TAOX - TNXP | 88% Closely correlated | -8.65% | ||
| WINT - TNXP | 88% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| RNAC - TNXP | 88% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| CDTX - TNXP | 87% Closely correlated | +2.88% | ||
More | ||||