IPGDF
Price
$3.15
Change
-$0.09 (-2.78%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.53B
MLPNF
Price
$2.36
Change
+$0.09 (+3.96%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
259.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPGDF vs MLPNF

Header iconIPGDF vs MLPNF Comparison
Open Charts IPGDF vs MLPNFBanner chart's image
IGO
Price$3.15
Change-$0.09 (-2.78%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.53B
MILLENNIAL POTASH
Price$2.36
Change+$0.09 (+3.96%)
Volume$122.11K
Capitalization259.82M
IPGDF vs MLPNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPGDF vs. MLPNF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPGDF is a Hold and MLPNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (IPGDF: $3.15 vs. MLPNF: $2.36)
Brand notoriety: IPGDF and MLPNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPGDF: 82% vs. MLPNF: 90%
Market capitalization -- IPGDF: $2.53B vs. MLPNF: $259.82M
IPGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.53B. MLPNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $259.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPGDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLPNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IPGDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MLPNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPGDF is a better buy in the long-term than MLPNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLPNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MLPNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLPNF is a better buy in the short-term than IPGDF.

Price Growth

IPGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.78% price change this week, while MLPNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +21.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPGDF($2.53B) has a higher market cap than MLPNF($260M). MLPNF YTD gains are higher at: 989.397 vs. IPGDF (1.613). MLPNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.98M vs. IPGDF (-811.1M). IPGDF has more cash in the bank: 344M vs. MLPNF (7.5M). MLPNF has less debt than IPGDF: MLPNF (88.9K) vs IPGDF (31.4M). IPGDF has higher revenues than MLPNF: IPGDF (512M) vs MLPNF (0).
IPGDFMLPNFIPGDF / MLPNF
Capitalization2.53B260M973%
EBITDA-811.1M-3.98M20,369%
Gain YTD1.613989.3970%
P/E Ratio980.99N/A-
Revenue512M0-
Total Cash344M7.5M4,586%
Total Debt31.4M88.9K35,321%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPGDF: Fundamental Ratings
IPGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPGDFMLPNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFIMX15.200.12
+0.80%
Clipper
JWWFX130.880.77
+0.59%
Janus Henderson Global Research I
UGOFX12.520.07
+0.56%
Victory Global Managed Volatility Instl
CWICX74.250.31
+0.42%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc 529C
NCEGX23.360.08
+0.34%
The North Country Large Cap Equity Fund

IPGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPGDF has been loosely correlated with MALRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPGDF jumps, then MALRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPGDF
1D Price
Change %
IPGDF100%
N/A
MALRY - IPGDF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
PMETF - IPGDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
LYSDY - IPGDF
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
LYSCF - IPGDF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
AMVMF - IPGDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLPNF and IPGDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLPNF and IPGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLPNF
1D Price
Change %
MLPNF100%
+3.88%
IPGDF - MLPNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZNCXF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
NVAAF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRCMF - MLPNF
15%
Poorly correlated
+27.42%
USGO - MLPNF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More