IPGDF
Price
$2.72
Change
+$0.02 (+0.74%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.18B
LYSCF
Price
$5.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.31B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPGDF vs LYSCF

Header iconIPGDF vs LYSCF Comparison
Open Charts IPGDF vs LYSCFBanner chart's image
IGO
Price$2.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.74%)
Volume$2.9K
Capitalization7.18B
Lynas Rare Earths
Price$5.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16.52K
Capitalization4.31B
IPGDF vs LYSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPGDF vs. LYSCF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPGDF is a Hold and LYSCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IPGDF: $2.72 vs. LYSCF: $5.49)
Brand notoriety: IPGDF and LYSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPGDF: 64% vs. LYSCF: 30%
Market capitalization -- IPGDF: $7.18B vs. LYSCF: $4.31B
IPGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.18B. LYSCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $4.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPGDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLYSCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IPGDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LYSCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPGDF is a better buy in the long-term than LYSCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYSCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LYSCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IPGDF is a better buy in the short-term than LYSCF.

Price Growth

IPGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.06% price change this week, while LYSCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYSCF is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPGDF($7.18B) has a higher market cap than LYSCF($4.31B). IPGDF has higher P/E ratio than LYSCF: IPGDF (12.74) vs LYSCF (11.52). LYSCF YTD gains are higher at: 36.908 vs. IPGDF (-12.232). IPGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.26B vs. LYSCF (617M). IPGDF has more cash in the bank: 494M vs. LYSCF (102M). LYSCF has less debt than IPGDF: LYSCF (202M) vs IPGDF (947M). IPGDF has higher revenues than LYSCF: IPGDF (1.02B) vs LYSCF (961M).
IPGDFLYSCFIPGDF / LYSCF
Capitalization7.18B4.31B167%
EBITDA1.26B617M204%
Gain YTD-12.23236.908-33%
P/E Ratio12.7411.52111%
Revenue1.02B961M106%
Total Cash494M102M484%
Total Debt947M202M469%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPGDF vs LYSCF: Fundamental Ratings
IPGDF
LYSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
4882
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPGDF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYSCF (90). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPGDF (100). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYSCF (82). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as IPGDF (62). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSCF (2). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew similarly to LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPGDFLYSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEOE42.460.10
+0.24%
FIRST EAGLE OVERSEAS EQUITY ETF
IYK71.150.14
+0.20%
iShares US Consumer Staples ETF
UJUN35.670.05
+0.13%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun
PFFV22.95N/A
N/A
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
TMET25.08N/A
N/A
iShares Transition-Enabling Metals ETF

IPGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPGDF has been loosely correlated with MALRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPGDF jumps, then MALRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPGDF
1D Price
Change %
IPGDF100%
+0.77%
MALRY - IPGDF
40%
Loosely correlated
+7.44%
PMETF - IPGDF
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
LYSDY - IPGDF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
LYSCF - IPGDF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
AMVMF - IPGDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LYSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYSCF has been closely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYSCF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSCF
1D Price
Change %
LYSCF100%
+0.09%
LYSDY - LYSCF
88%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
BDNNY - LYSCF
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
GLNCY - LYSCF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
PILBF - LYSCF
43%
Loosely correlated
+9.60%
GLCNF - LYSCF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More