44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IPAY vs QTWO
IPAY vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts IPAY vs QTWO
Amplify Digital Payments ETF
Price$57.41
Change+$1.45 (+2.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.93M
IPAY vs QTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IPAY vs. QTWO commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAY is a Hold and QTWO is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 12 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IPAY | QTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IPAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAY has been closely correlated with PYPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPAY jumps, then PYPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAY | 100% | -3.37% | ||
| PYPL - IPAY | 72% Closely correlated | -5.32% | ||
| AFRM - IPAY | 72% Closely correlated | -3.18% | ||
| XYZ - IPAY | 70% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| QTWO - IPAY | 70% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| COIN - IPAY | 67% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||
QTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTWO | 100% | -3.15% | ||
| FRSH - QTWO | 66% Loosely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| ALKT - QTWO | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| ANSS - QTWO | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| WEAV - QTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.16% | ||
| ADSK - QTWO | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||