Advertisement
IPAR vs RBGLY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAR is a Buy and RBGLY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IPAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBGLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IPAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RBGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IPAR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBGLY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IPAR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- RBGLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
IPAR (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while RBGLY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
IPAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
RBGLY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-1.71% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| IPAR | RBGLY | IPAR / RBGLY | |
| Capitalization | 4.5B | 53.8B | 8% |
| EBITDA | 278M | 3.9B | 7% |
| Gain YTD | 4.720 | 18.483 | 26% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.13 | 18.69 | 156% |
| Revenue | 1.32B | 15B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 183M | 1.03B | 18% |
| Total Debt | 192M | 8.64B | 2% |
IPAR | RBGLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RBGLY's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as IPAR (37) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for RBGLY (100) in the null industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew significantly faster than RBGLY’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's SMR Rating (41) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBGLY (94) in the null industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBGLY’s over the last 12 months.
RBGLY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as IPAR (46) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
RBGLY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as IPAR (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
| IPAR | RBGLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 39% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EVLN | 49.86 | N/A | N/A |
| Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | |||
| DGRO | 62.82 | -0.63 | -0.99% |
| iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| NZAC | 38.11 | -0.49 | -1.27% |
| SPDR® MSCI ACWI Climate Paris AlignedETF | |||
| GNOM | 8.30 | -0.13 | -1.51% |
| Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF | |||
| DWLD | 40.21 | -0.66 | -1.61% |
| Davis Select Worldwide ETF | |||
IPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAR has been loosely correlated with COTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPAR jumps, then COTY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAR | 100% | -3.28% | ||
| COTY - IPAR | 48% Loosely correlated | -5.96% | ||
| EL - IPAR | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.83% | ||
| SPB - IPAR | 42% Loosely correlated | -4.73% | ||
| ELF - IPAR | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| HNST - IPAR | 37% Loosely correlated | -4.62% | ||
More | ||||
RBGLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RBGLY and UL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBGLY and UL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBGLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBGLY | 100% | -1.77% | ||
| UL - RBGLY | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| KMB - RBGLY | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
| IPAR - RBGLY | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.28% | ||
| SPCO - RBGLY | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RBGPF - RBGLY | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||