Advertisement
IPAR vs NWL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAR is a Hold and NWL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IPAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IPAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IPAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IPAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NWL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
IPAR (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +6.39% price change this week, while NWL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
IPAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
NWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| IPAR | NWL | IPAR / NWL | |
| Capitalization | 3.16B | 2.03B | 155% |
| EBITDA | 302M | 346M | 87% |
| Gain YTD | -23.717 | -49.527 | 48% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.60 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.46B | 7.4B | 20% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 219M | - |
| Total Debt | 280M | 5.63B | 5% |
IPAR | NWL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 8 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NWL's Valuation (8) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as IPAR (24) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew similarly to IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWL (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWL’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's SMR Rating (44) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWL (95) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWL’s over the last 12 months.
NWL's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as IPAR (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew similarly to IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
NWL's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPAR (84) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew significantly faster than IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
| IPAR | NWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IVORX | 19.34 | 0.05 | +0.26% |
| Macquarie Mid Cap Income Opps R | |||
| FNKLX | 16.76 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Series Value Discovery | |||
| FGEMX | 137.77 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesM | |||
| TRSYX | 17.30 | -0.11 | -0.63% |
| T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index | |||
| AGIRX | 21.69 | -0.14 | -0.64% |
| Alger Mid Cap Growth Institutional R | |||
IPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAR has been loosely correlated with EL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPAR jumps, then EL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAR | 100% | +2.47% | ||
| EL - IPAR | 49% Loosely correlated | +4.11% | ||
| COTY - IPAR | 47% Loosely correlated | +4.58% | ||
| SPB - IPAR | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| HNST - IPAR | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ELF - IPAR | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
NWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWL has been loosely correlated with SPB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWL jumps, then SPB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWL | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| SPB - NWL | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| ELF - NWL | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| HELE - NWL | 41% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
| IPAR - NWL | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| EL - NWL | 36% Loosely correlated | +4.11% | ||
More | ||||