IP
Price
$48.69
Change
+$0.38 (+0.79%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
25.71B
54 days until earnings call
SON
Price
$46.22
Change
+$0.71 (+1.56%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.56B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IP vs SON

Header iconIP vs SON Comparison
Open Charts IP vs SONBanner chart's image
International Paper
Price$48.69
Change+$0.38 (+0.79%)
Volume$2.61M
Capitalization25.71B
Sonoco Products
Price$46.22
Change+$0.71 (+1.56%)
Volume$1.25M
Capitalization4.56B
IP vs SON Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IP vs. SON commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IP is a StrongBuy and SON is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IP: $48.69 vs. SON: $46.22)
Brand notoriety: IP and SON are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IP: 60% vs. SON: 132%
Market capitalization -- IP: $25.71B vs. SON: $4.56B
IP [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $25.71B. SON’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $4.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSON’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SON’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IP and SON are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SON’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SON’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SON is a better buy in the short-term than IP.

Price Growth

IP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while SON (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

IP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

SON is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-0.33% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IP($25.7B) has a higher market cap than SON($4.56B). SON has higher P/E ratio than IP: SON (49.17) vs IP (45.84). SON YTD gains are higher at: -2.057 vs. IP (-6.996). SON has less debt than IP: SON (5.69B) vs IP (10.4B).
IPSONIP / SON
Capitalization25.7B4.56B564%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.996-2.057340%
P/E Ratio45.8449.1793%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.4B5.69B183%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IP vs SON: Fundamental Ratings
IP
SON
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1769
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4992
SMR RATING
1..100
9246
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
245
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SON's Valuation (16) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as IP (30). This means that SON’s stock grew similarly to IP’s over the last 12 months.

IP's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SON (92). This means that IP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SON’s over the last 12 months.

SON's SMR Rating (46) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IP (92). This means that SON’s stock grew somewhat faster than IP’s over the last 12 months.

IP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SON (59). This means that IP’s stock grew similarly to SON’s over the last 12 months.

SON's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as IP (24). This means that SON’s stock grew similarly to IP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPSON
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BABX33.622.18
+6.93%
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
GUNR42.690.05
+0.12%
FlexShares Mstar Glbl Upstrm Nat Res ETF
UPSD25.73-0.09
-0.34%
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
LGH57.78-0.27
-0.47%
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
RINF32.68-0.16
-0.49%
ProShares Inflation Expectations

IP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IP has been closely correlated with SW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IP jumps, then SW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IP
1D Price
Change %
IP100%
+0.79%
SW - IP
75%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
PKG - IP
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
SEE - IP
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
SON - IP
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
GPK - IP
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
More

SON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SON has been loosely correlated with SEE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SON jumps, then SEE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SON
1D Price
Change %
SON100%
+1.56%
SEE - SON
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
AMCR - SON
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
SLGN - SON
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
GEF - SON
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
AVY - SON
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
More