IP
Price
$39.37
Change
-$0.09 (-0.23%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
20.79B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PACK
Price
$5.79
Change
+$0.09 (+1.58%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
488.54M
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IP vs PACK

Header iconIP vs PACK Comparison
Open Charts IP vs PACKBanner chart's image
International Paper
Price$39.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
Volume$1.06M
Capitalization20.79B
Ranpak Holdings
Price$5.79
Change+$0.09 (+1.58%)
Volume$156.59K
Capitalization488.54M
IP vs PACK Comparison Chart in %
IP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PACK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IP vs. PACK commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IP is a Buy and PACK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IP: $39.37 vs. PACK: $5.79)
Brand notoriety: IP and PACK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IP: 21% vs. PACK: 35%
Market capitalization -- IP: $20.79B vs. PACK: $488.54M
IP [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $20.79B. PACK’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $488.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePACK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PACK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IP is a better buy in the long-term than PACK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PACK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PACK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IP is a better buy in the short-term than PACK.

Price Growth

IP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while PACK (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +8.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

IP is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

PACK is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+0.31% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IP($20.8B) has a higher market cap than PACK($489M). PACK YTD gains are higher at: -15.843 vs. IP (-24.798). IP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.45B vs. PACK (50.5M). IP has more cash in the bank: 995M vs. PACK (49.9M). PACK has less debt than IP: PACK (432M) vs IP (10.4B). IP has higher revenues than PACK: IP (24.3B) vs PACK (388M).
IPPACKIP / PACK
Capitalization20.8B489M4,254%
EBITDA2.45B50.5M4,857%
Gain YTD-24.798-15.843157%
P/E Ratio45.84N/A-
Revenue24.3B388M6,263%
Total Cash995M49.9M1,994%
Total Debt10.4B432M2,407%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IP vs PACK: Fundamental Ratings
IP
PACK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
481
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
9593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IP's Valuation (20) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is significantly better than the same rating for PACK (94) in the null industry. This means that IP’s stock grew significantly faster than PACK’s over the last 12 months.

IP's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as PACK (100) in the null industry. This means that IP’s stock grew similarly to PACK’s over the last 12 months.

PACK's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as IP (95) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that PACK’s stock grew similarly to IP’s over the last 12 months.

PACK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as IP (62) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that PACK’s stock grew similarly to IP’s over the last 12 months.

IP's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is significantly better than the same rating for PACK (100) in the null industry. This means that IP’s stock grew significantly faster than PACK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPPACK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PACK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMSA21.830.17
+0.78%
CMS Energy Corp
IYG94.070.52
+0.56%
iShares US Financial Services ETF
PDN42.420.16
+0.38%
Invesco RAFI Developed Mkts ex-US S-METF
XCLR30.670.10
+0.33%
Global X S&P 500® Collar 95-110 ETF
KURE17.62-0.02
-0.11%
KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF

IP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IP has been closely correlated with SW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IP jumps, then SW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IP
1D Price
Change %
IP100%
-0.23%
SW - IP
77%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
PKG - IP
67%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
SON - IP
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
AVY - IP
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
AMCR - IP
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More

PACK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PACK has been loosely correlated with SW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PACK jumps, then SW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PACK
1D Price
Change %
PACK100%
+1.58%
SW - PACK
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
IP - PACK
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
SON - PACK
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
GEF - PACK
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
SLGN - PACK
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More