IONQ
Price
$62.97
Change
-$2.62 (-3.99%)
Updated
Oct 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.79B
19 days until earnings call
YIBO
Price
$1.28
Change
+$0.03 (+2.40%)
Updated
Oct 17, 02:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
74.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IONQ vs YIBO

Header iconIONQ vs YIBO Comparison
Open Charts IONQ vs YIBOBanner chart's image
IonQ
Price$62.97
Change-$2.62 (-3.99%)
Volume$89.73K
Capitalization22.79B
Planet Image International
Price$1.28
Change+$0.03 (+2.40%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization74.04M
IONQ vs YIBO Comparison Chart in %
IONQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YIBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IONQ vs. YIBO commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IONQ is a Hold and YIBO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (IONQ: $65.59 vs. YIBO: $1.25)
Brand notoriety: IONQ and YIBO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IONQ: 131% vs. YIBO: 71%
Market capitalization -- IONQ: $22.79B vs. YIBO: $74.04M
IONQ [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $22.79B. YIBO’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $74.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $183.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $13.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IONQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYIBO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IONQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YIBO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, YIBO is a better buy in the long-term than IONQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IONQ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YIBO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IONQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • YIBO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IONQ is a better buy in the short-term than YIBO.

Price Growth

IONQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -15.37% price change this week, while YIBO (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -12.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +95.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

IONQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (+1.52% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IONQ($22.8B) has a higher market cap than YIBO($74M). IONQ YTD gains are higher at: 57.027 vs. YIBO (-63.235).
IONQYIBOIONQ / YIBO
Capitalization22.8B74M30,811%
EBITDA-339.34MN/A-
Gain YTD57.027-63.235-90%
P/E RatioN/A10.60-
Revenue52.4MN/A-
Total Cash543MN/A-
Total Debt19.3MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IONQYIBO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IONQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YIBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POAHY3.890.02
+0.52%
Porsche Automobile Holding SE
FGPRB160.00N/A
N/A
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.
LDDD0.93N/A
N/A
LONGDUODUO CO LTD.
DSHKO8.00N/A
N/A
Drive Shack Inc.
HNLGY9.39-0.31
-3.20%
Hang Lung Group Ltd.

IONQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IONQ has been loosely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IONQ jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IONQ
1D Price
Change %
IONQ100%
-9.42%
RGTI - IONQ
63%
Loosely correlated
-14.86%
QBTS - IONQ
60%
Loosely correlated
-9.65%
QUBT - IONQ
55%
Loosely correlated
-11.73%
UMAC - IONQ
39%
Loosely correlated
-10.59%
PSTG - IONQ
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
More

YIBO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YIBO and NNDM have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YIBO and NNDM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YIBO
1D Price
Change %
YIBO100%
-3.85%
NNDM - YIBO
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.69%
IONQ - YIBO
14%
Poorly correlated
-9.42%
RGTI - YIBO
13%
Poorly correlated
-14.86%
AGMH - YIBO
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
HPQ - YIBO
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.93%
More