IONQ
Price
$59.95
Change
-$2.98 (-4.73%)
Updated
Oct 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.87B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
TACT
Price
$4.65
Change
+$0.04 (+0.87%)
Updated
Oct 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
46.53M
17 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IONQ vs TACT

Header iconIONQ vs TACT Comparison
Open Charts IONQ vs TACTBanner chart's image
IonQ
Price$59.95
Change-$2.98 (-4.73%)
Volume$88.32K
Capitalization21.87B
TransAct Technologies
Price$4.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.87%)
Volume$100
Capitalization46.53M
IONQ vs TACT Comparison Chart in %
IONQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IONQ vs. TACT commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IONQ is a Hold and TACT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (IONQ: $62.94 vs. TACT: $4.61)
Brand notoriety: IONQ and TACT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IONQ: 121% vs. TACT: 82%
Market capitalization -- IONQ: $21.87B vs. TACT: $46.53M
IONQ [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $21.87B. TACT’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $46.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $179.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $13.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IONQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTACT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IONQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TACT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TACT is a better buy in the long-term than IONQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IONQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TACT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IONQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TACT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TACT is a better buy in the short-term than IONQ.

Price Growth

IONQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -10.91% price change this week, while TACT (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -13.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +89.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

IONQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

TACT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (-2.21% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IONQ($21.9B) has a higher market cap than TACT($46.5M). IONQ YTD gains are higher at: 50.682 vs. TACT (12.714). TACT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.04M vs. IONQ (-339.34M). IONQ has more cash in the bank: 543M vs. TACT (17.7M). TACT has less debt than IONQ: TACT (3.7M) vs IONQ (19.3M). IONQ has higher revenues than TACT: IONQ (52.4M) vs TACT (47.9M).
IONQTACTIONQ / TACT
Capitalization21.9B46.5M47,097%
EBITDA-339.34M-1.04M32,786%
Gain YTD50.68212.714399%
P/E RatioN/A60.17-
Revenue52.4M47.9M109%
Total Cash543M17.7M3,068%
Total Debt19.3M3.7M521%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TACT: Fundamental Ratings
TACT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IONQTACT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IONQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPD39.180.17
+0.42%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Dwnsd Cnvxty ETF
PXF61.920.11
+0.19%
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-US ETF
ARKZ44.50N/A
N/A
ARK 21Shares Active Ethereum Futures Strategy ETF
TBFG28.93N/A
N/A
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
CSNR29.29-0.25
-0.86%
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Act ETF

IONQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IONQ has been loosely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IONQ jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IONQ
1D Price
Change %
IONQ100%
-4.04%
RGTI - IONQ
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
QBTS - IONQ
60%
Loosely correlated
-5.26%
QUBT - IONQ
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
UMAC - IONQ
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.22%
PSTG - IONQ
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

TACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TACT and IONQ have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TACT and IONQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TACT
1D Price
Change %
TACT100%
-3.56%
IONQ - TACT
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
DELL - TACT
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
PSTG - TACT
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
NTAP - TACT
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
CRCT - TACT
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More